Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39799337›Full record

ArticleMolecular cancer2025

Commentary on "Epigenome-wide analysis across the development span of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia: backtracking to birth".

Emma Raitoharju, Saara Marttila

Abstract readLetterComment
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Emma RaitoharjuMolecular Epidemiology (MOLE), Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland. emma.raitoharju@tuni.fi.
Saara MarttilaMolecular Epidemiology (MOLE), Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland. saara.marttila@tuni.fi.

Funding

Research Council of Finland 330809, 338395, 322098, 356405State funding for university-level health research, Tampere University Hospital, the Wellbeing Services County of Pirkanmaa and Fimlab Oy 9AC077, 9X047, 9S054, 9AB059, T63074Yrjö Jahnssonin Säätiö 20227543, 20207299, 20197212
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

VTRNA2-1 is a polymorphically imprinted locus. The proportion of individuals with a maternally imprinted VTRNA2-1 locus is consistently approximately 75% in populations of European origin, with the remaining circa 25% having a non-methylated VTRNA2-1 locus. Recently, VTRNA2-1 hypermethylation at birth was suggested to be a precursor of paediatric acute lymphoblastic leukaemia with biomarker potential. The results presented by Ghantous et al. [1] allow for an alternative interpretation to what the authors discussed, and we argue that the observed methylation difference at birth is due to an uneven distribution of imprinted and non-methylated individuals among the cases and controls, with all individuals presenting normative physiological VTRNA2-1 methylation levels. In addition, the notable interindividual variation arising from the polymorphic imprinting in VTRNA2-1 methylation levels calls into question the validity of VTRNA2-1 methylation as a biomarker.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticEpigenomePrecursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaBiomarkers, TumorChildDNA MethylationGenomic ImprintingHumansBiomarkers, TumorDNA methylationEpigeneticsImprintingnc886Paediatric leukaemiaVTRNA2-1

Identifiers

PMID39799337
PMCPMC11724579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.