Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39799335›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2025

Identifying the mentorship needs among faculty in a large department of psychiatry- support for the creation of a formal mentorship program.

Mary Jane Esplen, Lisa M Fiksenbaum, Elizabeth Lin, Shaheen A Darani, John Teshima, Simone N Vigod, Nicole Kozloff, Peter Szatmari, Krista L Lanctôt, Certina Ho and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Mentorship, Sponsorship, and Coaching in Academic Medicine: Essential Elements of Faculty Development.Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Mary Jane EsplenUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. maryjane.esplen@utoronto.ca.
Lisa M FiksenbaumUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Elizabeth LinUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Shaheen A DaraniUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
John TeshimaUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Simone N VigodUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Nicole KozloffUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Peter SzatmariUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Krista L LanctôtUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Certina HoUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Ivan SilverUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Sophie SoklaridisUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Jiahui WongUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStudy aims were to assess the current state and needs of faculty to inform the design of a formal mentorship program in a large academic Department of Psychiatry.

methodsA 57- item self-administered online survey questionnaire was distributed to all faculty members.

results225 faculty members completed the survey (24%). 68% of respondents had a mentor and reported high satisfaction (mean = 4.3, SD = 1.05) (range 1 to 5). Among those respondents lacking access to mentorship, 65% expressed interest. Open-ended questions indicated that international medical graduates, faculty identifying as minority, women and clinician teachers may lack access to mentorship. PhD faculty felt disadvantaged compared to MD faculty in gaining first authorship (M

conclusionsChallenges and inequities were identified with the department's current ad hoc approach to mentorship. A limitation of the study was the response rate, while similar to response rates of other physician surveys, raises the potential for response bias. In comparing study participants to the department, the sample appeared to provide a fair representation. The study has implications for identifying the need and design of more formal mentorship programs in academic medicine.

Indexed as

Faculty, MedicalMentoringMentorsPsychiatryAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeeds AssessmentSurveys and QuestionnairesInequities in mentorshipMentorshipPriorities in mentorship; academic medicinePsychiatry Department

Identifiers

PMID39799335
PMCPMC11724559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.