SynthesisRadiation oncology (London, England)2025
Efficacy and safety of proton radiotherapy in treating choroidal melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Uveal melanoma: ESMO-EURACAN Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.ESMO open · 2026Guideline
- Gamma Knife Stereotactic Radiosurgery With a Reduced Peripheral Dose: Outcomes in Uveal Melanoma Patients.Advances in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Ophthalmic complications of radiotherapy.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Review
- Clinical decision-making for uveal melanoma radiotherapy: comparative performance of experienced radiation oncologists and leading generative AI models.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundProton beam therapy (PBT) has been gradually introduced for treating choroidal melanoma. This study systematically reviewed clinical reports to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PBT in choroidal melanoma patients.
methodsThis systematic review included all the primary studies involving PBT for choroidal melanoma patients through April 2024. Four publicly accessible databases were searched, and the statistical data were analyzed using STATA 15.0. The outcomes of interest included overall survival (OS), metastasis-free survival, local control rate, and adverse reactions.
resultsA total of six case series involving 1059 patients with choroidal melanoma were included. The random effect model meta-analysis showed that the 2-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year OS rates of patients with choroidal melanoma treated with PBT were 97%, 92%, 73%, and 39%, respectively. The metastasis-free survival rates at 2, 3, and 5 years were 92%, 89%, and 76%, respectively, and the local control rates at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years were 98%, 92%, 94%, and 88%, respectively. Four studies reported adverse reactions. The most common adverse reactions after PBT were glaucoma, optic neuropathy, and cataracts, with incidence rates ranging from 17.9 to 27%, 12.8-64%, and 29.6-39.8%, respectively.
conclusionsThis meta-analysis identified PBT as a vital local treatment strategy against choroidal melanoma. Both OS and local control rates showed excellent results. However, more prospective trials can help compare the efficacy of PBT with typical therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.