ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
Obstetric outcomes in breastfeeding women in the first hour of delivery before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionBreastfeeding provides several benefits to the health of women and newborns and constituting a protective factor against infant morbidity and mortality in the short and long term. OBJECTIVES/RESEARCH QUESTIONS: The study aims to compare obstetric outcomes in women who did and did not breastfeed after birth.
methodCross-sectional epidemiological study, nested in a cohort, carried out with secondary data from the survey "Birth and breastfeeding in children of mothers infected with SARS-CoV-2", carried out in 2020, in Brazil. The results obtained were compared with those of the study "Birth in Belo Horizonte: survey on childbirth and birth", carried out in 2011-2012.
results1082 women were included in the sample of the survey carried out in the pandemic period and 382 in the pre-pandemic period. A total of 1,082 women were included in the sample of the research carried out during the pandemic period and 382 during the pre-pandemic period. A higher proportion of women who breastfed within the first hour after delivery and: did not have an indication for cesarean section in the pre-pandemic period and women without obstetric complications in the pre-pandemic period were observed when compared to the pandemic period. Regarding the comparison between infected/suspected and non-infected women, we observed: higher proportions of women who had a vaginal delivery and breastfed after delivery in non-infected women and higher proportions of non-infected women, with no indication for cesarean section at the time of admission and who breastfed within the first hour after delivery - when compared to infected/suspected women. Finally, regarding the multivariate analysis of the pre-pandemic period, we observed that women who had fewer than 7 prenatal consultations reduced, on average, 0.36 times the chance of breastfeeding after delivery (p = 0.007). Regarding the pandemic period, we observed that women who underwent cesarean section reduced, on average, 0.61 times the chance of breastfeeding after delivery (p = 0.027), women who had a newborn weighing less than 2500 g reduced, on average, 0.29 times the chance of breastfeeding after delivery (p = 0.031) and women who had a newborn with complications after delivery reduced, on average, 0.05 times the chance of breastfeeding after delivery (p < 0.001).
conclusionsThese findings highlight the importance of prenatal monitoring and childbirth assistance, especially in times of crisis, to promote breastfeeding. Furthermore, these findings may provide important contributions to improving health and care related to labor, delivery, birth and the postpartum period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.