ArticleBMC pediatrics2025
Posttraumatic stress disorder in disaster-exposed youth: examining diagnostic concordance and model fit using ICD-11 and DSM-5 criteria.
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostic comparisons of PTSD and complex PTSD in clinical adolescents: Detection rates and ACEs as risk factors.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2026Article
- Comparison of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in DSM-5 and ICD-11 in children and adolescents: rates of probable PTSD, diagnostic agreement, and comorbidity.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCompeting definitions of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) have been proposed by ICD-11 and DSM-5; it is unclear which diagnostic model works best for children and adolescents. Although other studies have predicted the impact of these models by approximating the criteria using older measures, this study advances the research by comparing measures designed to assess ICD-11 and DSM-5 criteria in hurricane-exposed youth. This study evaluates ICD-11 and DSM-5 (both the standard and preschool-age) diagnostic models by identifying diagnostic rates, evaluating diagnostic concordance, investigating the predictive value of constructs associated with PTSD (demographics, disaster threat and exposure, functional impairment), and examining model fit.
methodThe sample was exposed to Hurricane Ian (2022), a deadly Category 5 hurricane. Parents reported on disaster exposure and their child's PTSD symptoms (n = 152; ages 7-17) using the International Trauma Questionnaire for Children and Adolescents Caregiver Version (ITQ-CG) for ICD-11 criteria and UCLA PTSD Reaction Index for DSM-5, Parent/Caregiver Report Version (RI-5) for DSM-5 criteria.
resultsICD-11 PTSD symptom criteria rates were 24% and dropped to 20% when the impairment criterion was added. PTSD symptom criteria rates were 11% (10% with impairment) for DSM-5 and 13% (12% with impairment) for DSM-5 Preschool. ICD-11 rates were higher than DSM-5 and DSM-5 Preschool rates. There was no difference between DSM-5 and DSM-5 Preschool rates of PTSD. There was moderate to substantial concordance between ICD-11 and the DSM-5 models. All diagnostic models were associated with exposure and impairment, but only ICD-11 was associated with threat. ICD-11 was the only one to evidence acceptable model fit.
conclusionsUsing the ITQ-CG and RI-5 to assess PTSD in youth, results showed higher PTSD diagnostic rates for ICD-11 than DSM-5; this contradicts prior findings (based off approximated ICD-11 criteria) and seems largely due to differences in symptom thresholds used by the two measures. The ITQ-CG exhibited excellent model fit and was associated with several constructs important to PTSD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.