ArticleScientific reports2025
Improving spleen segmentation in ultrasound images using a hybrid deep learning framework.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Deep learning framework for automated frame selection in kidney ultrasound.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper introduces a novel method for spleen segmentation in ultrasound images, using a two-phase training approach. In the first phase, the SegFormerB0 network is trained to provide an initial segmentation. In the second phase, the network is further refined using the Pix2Pix structure, which enhances attention to details and corrects any erroneous or additional segments in the output. This hybrid method effectively combines the strengths of both SegFormer and Pix2Pix to produce highly accurate segmentation results. We have assembled the Spleenex dataset, consisting of 450 ultrasound images of the spleen, which is the first dataset of its kind in this field. Our method has been validated on this dataset, and the experimental results show that it outperforms existing state-of-the-art models. Specifically, our approach achieved a mean Intersection over Union (mIoU) of 94.17% and a mean Dice (mDice) score of 96.82%, surpassing models such as Splenomegaly Segmentation Network (SSNet), U-Net, and Variational autoencoder based methods. The proposed method also achieved a Mean Percentage Length Error (MPLE) of 3.64%, further demonstrating its accuracy. Furthermore, the proposed method has demonstrated strong performance even in the presence of noise in ultrasound images, highlighting its practical applicability in clinical environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.