Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39799225›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Signature-based intrusion detection using machine learning and deep learning approaches empowered with fuzzy clustering.

Usama Ahmed, Mohammad Nazir, Amna Sarwar, Tariq Ali, El-Hadi M Aggoune, Tariq Shahzad, Muhammad Adnan Khan

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Application of AI in Cyberattack Detection: A Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Usama AhmedDepartment of Artificial Intelligence, School of Systems and Technology, University of Management and Technology, Lahore, 54700, Pakistan.
Mohammad NazirDepartment of Computer Science and Information Technology, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, Pakistan.
Amna SarwarDepartment of Computer Science, University of Wah, Wah Cantt, Pakistan.
Tariq AliArtificial Intelligence and Sensing Technologies (AIST) Research Center, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, 71491, Saudi Arabia. teshaq@ut.edu.sa.
El-Hadi M AggouneArtificial Intelligence and Sensing Technologies (AIST) Research Center, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, 71491, Saudi Arabia.
Tariq ShahzadDepartment of Computer Engineering, COMSATS University Islamabad, Sahiwal Campus, Sahiwal, 57000, Pakistan.
Muhammad Adnan KhanDepartment of Software, Faculty of Artificial Intelligence and Software, Gachon University, Seongnam-si, 13120, Republic of Korea. adnan@gachon.ac.kr.

Funding

This work is supported by a research grant from the Research, Development, and Innovation Authority (RAID), Saudi Arabia. 13010-Tabuk-2023-UT-R-3-1-SE.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Network security is crucial in today's digital world, since there are multiple ongoing threats to sensitive data and vital infrastructure. The aim of this study to improve network security by combining methods for instruction detection from machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL). Attackers have tried to breach security systems by accessing networks and obtaining sensitive information.Intrusion detection systems (IDSs) are one of the significant aspect of cybersecurity that involve the monitoring and analysis, with the intention of identifying and reporting of dangerous activities that would help to prevent the attack.Support Vector Machine (SVM), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Random Forest (RF), Decision Tree (DT), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) are the vector figures incorporated into the study through the results. These models are subjected to various test to established the best results on the identification and prevention of network violation. Based on the obtained results, it can be stated that all the tested models are capable of organizing data originating from network traffic. thus, recognizing the difference between normal and intrusive behaviors, models such as SVM, KNN, RF, and DT showed effective results. Deep learning models LSTM and ANN rapidly find long-term and complex pattern in network data. It is extremely effective when dealing with complex intrusions since it is characterised by high precision, accuracy and recall.Based on our study, SVM and Random Forest are considered promising solutions for real-world IDS applications because of their versatility and explainability. For the companies seeking IDS solutions which are reliable and at the same time more interpretable, these models can be promising. Additionally, LSTM and ANN, with their ability to catch successive conditions, are suitable for situations involving nuanced, advancing dangers.

Identifiers

PMID39799225
PMCPMC11724853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.