Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39799197›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2025

"Age of risk" shapes simpler multimodal communication in the juvenile plains zebra (Equus quagga).

Severine B S W Hex, Daniel I Rubenstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Severine B S W HexDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA. shex@princeton.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9142-6917
Daniel I RubensteinDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9049-5219

Funding

National Science Foundation (NSF) CNS- 025214National Science Foundation (NSF) IBN-9874523National Science Foundation (NSF) IOB-9874523
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Juveniles occupy a different social niche than adults, engaging in a smaller diversity of social contexts and perceiving greater social risks. Either or both of these factors may influence the form communication takes in immaturity and its developmental trajectory. We investigated the relative influence of these social forces on the development of multimodal communication in plains zebras (Equus quagga). Juveniles possessed smaller repertoires than adults, with lower combinatorial flexibility and greater stereotypy, particularly for signals used in submission. When interacting with adults, juveniles used a larger fraction of their repertoire, but with reduced combinatorial flexibility. The usage of a contextually flexible signal, "snapping", also shifted across development, beginning as a stereotyped, submissive signal before diversifying into the full range of adult usage. Taken together, the lower complexity of juvenile communication may reduce signal ambiguity and the risk of miscommunication when interacting with social partners perceived as higher risk, like adults.

Indexed as

Animal CommunicationSocial BehaviorAge FactorsAnimalsFemaleMale

Identifiers

PMID39799197
PMCPMC11724946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.