Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39799055›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of anaesthesia2025

Drug challenge testing: a critical step in the investigation of neuromuscular blocking agent hypersensitivity.

Anna Littlejohns, Philip M Hopkins, Sinisa Savic, Anoop Mistry, Louise Savic

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of anaesthesia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anna LittlejohnsDepartment of Theatres and Anaesthesia, St James' University Hospital, Leeds, UK. Electronic address: anna.littlejohns@nhs.net.
Philip M HopkinsDepartment of Theatres and Anaesthesia, St James' University Hospital, Leeds, UK; Leeds Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, St James' University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Sinisa SavicLeeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; Department of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, St James' University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Anoop MistryDepartment of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, St James' University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Louise SavicDepartment of Theatres and Anaesthesia, St James' University Hospital, Leeds, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuromuscular blocking agents are a common cause of perioperative hypersensitivity. The sensitivity and specificity of skin tests and in vitro tests in this context have not been determined conclusively, which poses a barrier to accurate diagnosis. Use of challenge testing represents a promising development in this field and a key tool in confirming tolerance to an alternate neuromuscular blocking agent for use in future anaesthesia. However, its use is currently limited to specialised centres, and a standardised approach to testing has not yet been established. This article summarises the role of challenge testing to neuromuscular blocking agents and highlights the advantages and disadvantages of the different approaches.

Indexed as

Drug HypersensitivityNeuromuscular Blocking AgentsHumansSkin TestsNeuromuscular Blocking Agentsanaphylaxisdrug challenge testinghypersensitivityneuromuscular blocking agentperioperative drug hypersensitivity

Identifiers

PMID39799055
PMCPMC11867077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.