Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39798982›Full record

Trial reportLancet (London, England)2025

Efficacy, safety, and target engagement of dazukibart, an IFNβ specific monoclonal antibody, in adults with dermatomyositis: a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial.

David Fiorentino, Aaron R Mangold, Victoria P Werth, Lisa Christopher-Stine, Alisa Femia, Myron Chu, Amy C M Musiek, Jason C Sluzevich, Lauren V Graham, Anthony P Fernandez and 16 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lancet (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03181893 (A PHASE 2 DOUBLE-BLIND, RANDOMIZED, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED STUDY TO EVALUATE THE EFFICACY, SAFETY, AND TOLERABILITY OF PF-06823859 IN ADULT SUBJECTS WITH DERMATOMYOSITIS), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03181893 phase2completednot on this map

A phase 2 double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of pf-06823859 in adult subjects with dermatomyositis

TypeinterventionalSponsorPfizerRan2018 to 2022Enrolled75ConditionsDermatomyositisArmsPF-06823859 low, Placebo Arm, PF-06823859 high
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Emerging therapies in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies.Journal of neuromuscular diseases · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Potential new targets for rheumatic diseases.EULAR rheumatology open · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

David FiorentinoDepartment of Dermatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Redwood City, CA, USA.
Aaron R MangoldDepartment of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
Victoria P WerthUniversity of Pennsylvania, Corporal Michael J Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Lisa Christopher-StineDepartment of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Alisa FemiaRonald O Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York City, NY, USA.
Myron ChuPfizer, Collegeville, PA, USA.
Amy C M MusiekDivision of Dermatology, Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, MO, USA.
Jason C SluzevichDepartment of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Lauren V GrahamDepartment of Dermatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Anthony P FernandezDepartment of Dermatology and Department of Pathology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Rohit AggarwalDepartment of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Kerri RiegerDepartment of Dermatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Redwood City, CA, USA.
Karen M PagePfizer, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Xingpeng LiPfizer, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Craig HydePfizer, Groton, CT, USA.
Natalie RathPfizer, Collegeville, PA, USA.
Abigail SloanPfizer, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Barry OemarPfizer, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Anindita BanerjeePfizer, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Mikhail SalganikPfizer, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Christopher BanfieldPfizer, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Srividya NeelakantanPfizer, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Jean S BeebePfizer, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Michael S VincentPfizer, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Elena PeevaPfizer, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Ruth Ann VleugelsDepartment of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: rvleugels@bwh.harvard.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDermatomyositis is a chronic autoimmune disease with distinctive cutaneous eruptions and muscle weakness, and the pathophysiology is characterised by type I interferon (IFN) dysregulation. This study aims to assess the efficacy, safety, and target engagement of dazukibart, a potent, selective, humanised IgG1 neutralising monoclonal antibody directed against IFNβ, in adults with moderate-to-severe dermatomyositis.

methodsThis multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial was conducted at 25 university-based hospitals and outpatient sites in Germany, Hungary, Poland, Spain, and the USA. Adults aged 18-80 years with skin-predominant dermatomyositis were enrolled during stages 1, 2, and 2a, and had to have a Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index-Activity (CDASI-A) score of 14 or more and at least one unsuccessful systemic treatment with standard of care; whereas those with muscle-predominant dermatomyositis were enrolled in stage 3 and had to have active moderate muscle involvement. Patients were randomly assigned using an interactive response technology system to dazukibart 600 mg or placebo in stage 1; dazukibart 600 mg, dazukibart 150 mg, or placebo in stage 2; dazukibart 600 mg then placebo, dazukibart 150 mg then placebo, placebo then dazukibart 600 mg, or placebo then dazukibart 150 mg in stage 2a; and dazukibart 600 mg then placebo or placebo then dazukibart 600 mg in stage 3. For stage 2a and stage 3, treatments were switched at week 12. Patients, investigators, outcome assessors, and funders were masked to the treatment assignment. Dazukibart and placebo were administered intravenously on day 1 every 4 weeks, up to and including week 8 (stages 1 and 2, and stages 2a and 3 for patients starting dazukibart), or on week 12 every 4 weeks, up to and including week 20 (stages 2a and 3 for patients who started placebo and switched to dazukibart). The primary outcome for the skin-predominant cohorts was the change from baseline in CDASI-A score at week 12 assessed in the full analysis set (FAS; stage 1) and the pooled skin FAS (stages 1, 2, and 2a), and safety in the muscle-predominant cohort. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03181893.

findingsBetween Jan 23, 2018, and Feb 23, 2022, 125 adults were assessed and 50 were excluded. 75 patients were randomly assigned and treated (15 to dazukibart 150 mg, 37 to dazukibart 600 mg, and 23 to placebo). Most patients were female (53 [93%] of 57 in the skin-predominant cohort vs 13 [72%] of 18 in the muscle-predominant cohort and four [7%] vs five [28%] were male). In the FAS in stage 1 at week 12, the mean change from baseline in CDASI-A for dazukibart 600 mg was -18·8 (90% CI -21·8 to -15·8; placebo-adjusted difference -14·8 [-20·3 to -9·4]; p<0·0001). In the pooled skin FAS at week 12, the mean change from baseline in CDASI-A for the dazukibart 600 mg group was -19·2 (-21·5 to -16·8; placebo-adjusted difference -16·3 [-20·4 to -12·1]; p<0·0001), whereas the dazukibart 150 mg group was -16·6 (-19·8 to -13·4; placebo-adjusted difference -13·7 [-18·3 to -9·0]; p<0·0001). Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 12 (80%) of 15 patients in the dazukibart 150 mg group versus 30 (81%) of 37 in the dazukibart 600 mg group versus 18 (78%) of 23 in the placebo group, with the most common being infections and infestations (two [13%] vs 12 [32%] vs seven [30%]). Four (11%) patients in the dazukibart 150 mg group and one (4%) in the placebo group reported serious adverse events. One patient in stage 3 received dazukibart 600 mg then placebo and died during follow-up due to haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis and macrophage activation syndrome.

interpretationDazukibart resulted in a pronounced reduction in disease activity and was generally well tolerated, supporting IFNβ inhibition as a highly promising therapeutic strategy in adults with dermatomyositis.

fundingPfizer.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedDermatomyositisInterferon-betaAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedInterferon-beta

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.