Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39798946›Full record

Observational studyEmergency medicine journal : EMJ2025

Accuracy of the National Early Warning Score version 2 (NEWS2) in predicting need for time-critical treatment: retrospective observational cohort study.

Steve Goodacre, Laura Sutton, Gordon Fuller, Ashleigh Trimble, Richard Pilbery

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Emergency medicine journal : EMJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Assessing Risk of Early ICU Admission or Death at Emergency Department Triage: Clinical Judgment Versus Early Warning Scores.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026
    Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Steve GoodacreSheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK s.goodacre@sheffield.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0803-8444
Laura SuttonSheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Gordon FullerSheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8532-3500
Ashleigh TrimbleEmergency Department, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, UK.
Richard PilberyYorkshire Ambulance Service NHS Trust, Wakefield, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5797-9788

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInitial ED assessment can use early warning scores to identify and prioritise patients who need time-critical treatment. We aimed to determine the accuracy of the National Early Warning Score version 2 (NEWS2) for predicting the need for time-critical treatment.

methodsWe undertook a single-centre retrospective observational cohort study. We randomly selected 4000 adults who attended a tertiary hospital ED in England from 1 January 2022 to 31 December 2022 and had NEWS2 routinely recorded on electronic patient records. The first NEWS2 and vital signs were extracted from electronic records. Research nurses selected cases that received a potentially time-critical treatment. Two independent clinical experts then determined whether time-critical treatment was or should have been received using an expert consensus derived list of interventions. We used receiver operating characteristic analysis and calculated sensitivity and specificity at predefined thresholds to evaluate the accuracy of NEWS2 for predicting need for time-critical intervention and, as a secondary outcome, mortality at 7 days.

resultsAfter excluding 10 patients who received their intervention before NEWS2 recording, 164/3990 (4.1%) needed time-critical treatment and 71/3990 (1.8%) died within 7 days. NEWS2 predicted need for time-critical treatment with a c-statistic of 0.807 (95% CI 0.765 to 0.849) and death within 7 days with a c-statistic of 0.865 (95% CI 0.813, 0.917). NEWS2>4 predicted need for time-critical treatment with sensitivity of 51.8% (95% CI 44.2%, 59.3%) and positive predictive value of 25.8% (95% CI 21.3%, 30.7%). 37 of the 45 patients needing emergency surgery, antibiotics for open fractures, insulin infusion or manipulation of limb-threatening injuries had NEWS2≤4. Patients with NEWS2>4 who did not need time-critical treatment frequently scored maximum points on NEWS2 for their respiratory rate, conscious level or receiving supplemental oxygen.

conclusionNEWS2 has limited accuracy for predicting need for time-critical treatment. We have identified time-critical interventions that frequently have low NEWS2 scores and NEWS2 parameters than may overestimate need for time-critical intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Research Registry 10450.

Indexed as

Early Warning ScoreTime-to-TreatmentAdultAgedCohort StudiesEmergency Service, HospitalEnglandFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesROC Curveclinical assessmenttriage

Identifiers

PMID39798946
PMCPMC12171411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.