Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39798943›Full record

ArticleGigaScience2025

Similar, but not the same: multiomics comparison of human valve interstitial cells and osteoblast osteogenic differentiation expanded with an estimation of data-dependent and data-independent PASEF proteomics.

Arseniy Lobov, Polina Kuchur, Nadezhda Boyarskaya, Daria Perepletchikova, Ivan Taraskin, Andrei Ivashkin, Daria Kostina, Irina Khvorova, Vladimir Uspensky, Egor Repkin and 8 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in GigaScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Arseniy LobovLaboratory of Regenerative Biomedicine, Institute of Cytology Russian Academy of Science, St. Petersburg, 194064, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-0930-1171
Polina KuchurLaboratory of Regenerative Biomedicine, Institute of Cytology Russian Academy of Science, St. Petersburg, 194064, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-9415-577X
Nadezhda BoyarskayaLaboratory of Regenerative Biomedicine, Institute of Cytology Russian Academy of Science, St. Petersburg, 194064, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-6402-770X
Daria PerepletchikovaLaboratory of Regenerative Biomedicine, Institute of Cytology Russian Academy of Science, St. Petersburg, 194064, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-5056-3368
Ivan TaraskinLaboratory of Regenerative Biomedicine, Institute of Cytology Russian Academy of Science, St. Petersburg, 194064, Russia.ORCID 0009-0001-7251-1067
Andrei IvashkinLaboratory of Regenerative Biomedicine, Institute of Cytology Russian Academy of Science, St. Petersburg, 194064, Russia.ORCID 0009-0006-6039-3960
Daria KostinaLaboratory of Regenerative Biomedicine, Institute of Cytology Russian Academy of Science, St. Petersburg, 194064, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-0641-8101
Irina KhvorovaLaboratory of Regenerative Biomedicine, Institute of Cytology Russian Academy of Science, St. Petersburg, 194064, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-7124-9749
Vladimir UspenskyAlmazov National Medical Research Centre, St. Petersburg, 197341, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-7929-0594
Egor RepkinCentre for Molecular and Cell Technologies, St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, 199034, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-8599-3173
Evgeny DenisovLaboratory of Cancer Progression Biology, Cancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk, 634050, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-2923-9755
Tatiana GerashchenkoLaboratory of Cancer Progression Biology, Cancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk, 634050, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-7283-0092
Rashid TikhilovVreden National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics, St. Petersburg, 195427, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-0733-2414
Svetlana BozhkovaVreden National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics, St. Petersburg, 195427, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-2083-2424
Vitaly KarelkinVreden National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics, St. Petersburg, 195427, Russia.ORCID 0009-0005-3020-2417
Chunli WangSchool of Pharmacy, Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan, 430065, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8891-1797
Kang XuSchool of Pharmacy, Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan, 430065, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8492-2058
Anna MalashichevaLaboratory of Regenerative Biomedicine, Institute of Cytology Russian Academy of Science, St. Petersburg, 194064, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-0820-2913

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 23-15-00320
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteogenic differentiation is crucial in normal bone formation and pathological calcification, such as calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD). Understanding the proteomic and transcriptomic landscapes underlying this differentiation can unveil potential therapeutic targets for CAVD. In this study, we employed RNA sequencing transcriptomics and proteomics on a timsTOF Pro platform to explore the multiomics profiles of valve interstitial cells (VICs) and osteoblasts during osteogenic differentiation. For proteomics, we utilized 3 data acquisition/analysis techniques: data-dependent acquisition (DDA)-parallel accumulation serial fragmentation (PASEF) and data-independent acquisition (DIA)-PASEF with a classic library-based (DIA) and machine learning-based library-free search (DIA-ML). Using RNA sequencing data as a biological reference, we compared these 3 analytical techniques in the context of actual biological experiments. We use this comprehensive dataset to reveal distinct proteomic and transcriptomic profiles between VICs and osteoblasts, highlighting specific biological processes in their osteogenic differentiation pathways. The study identified potential therapeutic targets specific for VICs osteogenic differentiation in CAVD, including the MAOA and ERK1/2 pathway. From a technical perspective, we found that DIA-based methods demonstrate even higher superiority against DDA for more sophisticated human primary cell cultures than it was shown before on HeLa samples. While the classic library-based DIA approach has proved to be a gold standard for shotgun proteomics research, the DIA-ML offers significant advantages with a relatively minor compromise in data reliability, making it the method of choice for routine proteomics.

Indexed as

Aortic ValveAortic Valve StenosisCell DifferentiationOsteoblastsOsteogenesisProteomicsCalcinosisGene Expression ProfilingHumansMultiomicsProteomeTranscriptomeProteomecalcific aortic valve disease (CAVD)Data-Independent AcquisitionDIA-PASEFosteogenic differentiationtimsTOF Provalve interstitial cells

Identifiers

PMID39798943
PMCPMC11724719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.