ArticleHeart rhythm2025
Late-gadolinium enhancement predicts appropriate device therapies in nonischemic recipients of primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.
Article in Heart rhythm, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current Status of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators (ICDs)/Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy With Defibrillators (CRT-Ds) for Primary Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death.Journal of arrhythmia · 2026Review
- Risk stratification for sudden cardiac death in nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy: a moving target?Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBetter risk stratification is needed to evaluate patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) for prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). Growing evidence suggests that cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging may be useful in this regard.
objectiveWe aimed to determine if late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) seen on CMR (dichotomized as none or minimal <2% vs significant ≥2%) predicts appropriate ICD therapies (primary endpoint) or all-cause mortality/transplant/left-ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation (secondary endpoint) in patients with NICM.
methodsWe identified 344 patients with NICM who underwent primary prevention ICD implantation at Cleveland Clinic between 2003 and 2021 with CMR within 12 months before implant. LGE was calculated as percentage myocardium with pixel intensity ≥5 standard deviations higher than that of reference myocardium. Endpoints were adjudicated retrospectively by chart review.
resultsA total of 125 of 344 patients (36%) had none or minimal LGE, and 219 (64%) had significant LGE. Over a median follow-up of 61 months, 53 patients (24%) with significant LGE vs 10 (8%) with none or minimal LGE met the primary endpoint, and 56 patients (26%) vs 21 (17%) met the secondary endpoint, respectively. Significant LGE predicted the primary outcome in multivariable competing-risks regression (hazard ratio [HR] 2.99, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.48-6.02, P = .002), but did not predict the secondary outcome in multivariable Cox regression (HR 1.34, 95% CI 0.78-2.29, P = .287).
conclusionIn patients with NICM and primary prevention ICDs, LGE ≥2% is predictive of appropriate device therapies but not all-cause mortality/LVAD/transplant. LGE may be a relatively specific predictor of sudden cardiac arrest risk and therefore could potentially be used during evaluation for prophylactic ICD implantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.