Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39798597›Full record

ArticleBiological psychiatry2025

Focused Ultrasound Neuromodulation: Exploring a Novel Treatment for Severe Opioid Use Disorder.

Ali Rezai, Daisy G Y Thompson-Lake, Pierre-François D'Haese, Nathalie Meyer, Manish Ranjan, Daniel Farmer, Victor Finomore, Jennifer L Marton, Sally Hodder, Jeffrey Carpenter and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Ali RezaiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia.
Daisy G Y Thompson-LakeDepartment of Neuroscience, Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia.
Pierre-François D'HaeseDepartment of Neuroradiology, Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia.
Nathalie MeyerLaboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience, Neuro-X Institute, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Geneva, Switzerland.
Manish RanjanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia.
Daniel FarmerDepartment of Neuroscience, Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia; Department of Behavioral Medicine and Psychiatry, Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia.
Victor FinomoreDepartment of Neuroscience, Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia.
Jennifer L MartonDepartment of Neuroscience, Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia.
Sally HodderWest Virginia Clinical & Translational Science Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia.
Jeffrey CarpenterDepartment of Neuroradiology, Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia.
Aniruddha BhagwatDepartment of Neurosurgery, Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia.
James BerryDepartment of Neuroscience, Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia; Department of Behavioral Medicine and Psychiatry, Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia.
Padma TirumalaiDepartment of Neuroscience, Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia.
Geoffrey AdamsDepartment of Neuroscience, Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia.
Tasneem A ArsiwalaDepartment of Neuroscience, Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia.
Olaf BlankeLaboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience, Neuro-X Institute, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Geneva, Switzerland.
James J MahoneyDepartment of Neuroscience, Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia; Department of Behavioral Medicine and Psychiatry, Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia. Electronic address: james.mahoney@hsc.wvu.edu.

Funding

Feasibility of Deep Brain Stimulation as a Novel Treatment for Refractory Opioid Use DisorderUH3DA047714 · NIDA · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI REZAI, ALI R · 2022 to 2024
$5.6M
Feasibility of Deep Brain Stimulation as a Novel Treatment for Refractory Opioid Use DisorderUG3DA047714 · NIDA · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI REZAI, ALI R · 2018 to 2019
$750k
NIDA NIH HHS UG3 DA047714NIDA NIH HHS UH3 DA047714
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOpioid use disorder remains a critical health care challenge because current therapeutic strategies have limitations that result in high recurrence and deaths. We evaluated the safety and feasibility of focused ultrasound (FUS) neuromodulation to reduce substance cravings and use in severe opioid and co-occurring substance use disorders.

methodsThis prospective, open-label, single-arm study enrolled 8 participants with severe, primary opioid use disorder with co-occurring substance use. Participants received a 20-minute session of low-intensity FUS (220 kHz) neuromodulation targeting the bilateral nucleus accumbens (NAc) with follow-up for 90 days. Outcome measures included safety, tolerability, feasibility, and effects of FUS neuromodulation by assessment of adverse events, substance craving, substance use (self-report, urine toxicology), mood, neurological examinations, and anatomical and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) at 1, 7, 30, 60, and 90 days post-FUS.

resultsNo serious device-related adverse events or imaging abnormalities were observed. Following FUS, participants demonstrated immediate (p < .002) and sustained (p < .0001; mean 91%) reductions in cue-induced opioid craving, with median ratings on a scale from 0 to 10 as follows: 6.9 (pre-FUS) versus 0.6 (90-day post-FUS). Craving reductions were similar for other illicit substances (e.g., methamphetamine [p < .002], cocaine [p < .02]). Decreases in opioid and co-occurring substance use were confirmed by urine toxicology. Seven participants remained abstinent at 30 days; 5 participants remained abstinent throughout 90 days post-FUS. Resting-state fMRI demonstrated decreased connectivity from the NAc to reward and cognitive regions post-FUS.

conclusionsNAc FUS neuromodulation is safe and a potential adjunctive treatment for reducing drug cravings and use in individuals with severe opioid and co-occurring substance use disorders. Larger, sham-controlled, randomized studies are warranted.

Indexed as

Nucleus AccumbensOpioid-Related DisordersUltrasonic TherapyAdultCravingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAddictionFocused ultrasoundNeuromodulationOverdoseSubstance use disorder

Identifiers

PMID39798597
PMCPMC12167148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.