ReviewRheumatology (Oxford, England)2025
Poor prognostic factors and unmet needs in rheumatoid arthritis.
Review in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic biomarkers in rheumatoid arthritis.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2026Review
- Recent Knowledge Regarding the Epidemiology, Exacerbating Factors, and Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis Complicated by Interstitial Lung Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- A Potential Central Hub of Histamine in the Microbiota-Gut-Joint Axis in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Mechanisms and Translational Implications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- The prediction of a good therapeutic response and outcome: at baseline or after a short term?Clinical rheumatology · 2026Article
- Primary care anti-cyclic citrullinated protein antibody testing for rheumatoid arthritis and accompanying pathway redesign reduces unnecessary referrals.Rheumatology advances in practice · 2026Article
- Immunological heterogeneity in rheumatoid arthritis: challenges in early-stage stratification, non-response to targeted therapy, and the restoration of immune tolerance.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Rheumatoid factor and anti-citrullinated protein IgA antibodies in the diagnosis, prognosis and monitoring of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.Journal of translational autoimmunity · 2025Review
- Strengths and limitations of the EULAR definition for difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis.RMD open · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Prognostic factors in rheumatoid arthritis relate to several aspects, such as prediction of joint damage and loss of function or prediction of response to a particular therapy. For many decades it has been well established that high disease activity, especially exemplified by swollen joint counts and acute phase reactants, is associated with progression of joint damage. In addition, rheumatoid factor (RF) positive patients, but not patients with anti-citrullinated peptide antibodies (ACPA) are particularly prone to high disease activity and joint destruction. Newer studies have looked at molecular markers, but they have either not shown better results than those seen with the long-established ones or have not been sufficiently validated. Most recent insights suggest that high C-reactive protein levels may predict a particularly good response to IL-6 blockade, but not to other therapies, and that high RF-levels may be associated with better responses to Fc-free monoclonal antibodies than molecules containing an Fc-region. It is hoped, however, that with newer techniques and better insight into RA pathogenesis research may come up with even better molecular markers than currently available to predict responses to specific drugs in the not-too-distant future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.