Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39798131›Full record

ReviewRheumatology (Oxford, England)2025

Poor prognostic factors and unmet needs in rheumatoid arthritis.

Josef S Smolen

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Josef S SmolenDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine 3, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-4302-8877

Funding

AbbVieAstraZeneca
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prognostic factors in rheumatoid arthritis relate to several aspects, such as prediction of joint damage and loss of function or prediction of response to a particular therapy. For many decades it has been well established that high disease activity, especially exemplified by swollen joint counts and acute phase reactants, is associated with progression of joint damage. In addition, rheumatoid factor (RF) positive patients, but not patients with anti-citrullinated peptide antibodies (ACPA) are particularly prone to high disease activity and joint destruction. Newer studies have looked at molecular markers, but they have either not shown better results than those seen with the long-established ones or have not been sufficiently validated. Most recent insights suggest that high C-reactive protein levels may predict a particularly good response to IL-6 blockade, but not to other therapies, and that high RF-levels may be associated with better responses to Fc-free monoclonal antibodies than molecules containing an Fc-region. It is hoped, however, that with newer techniques and better insight into RA pathogenesis research may come up with even better molecular markers than currently available to predict responses to specific drugs in the not-too-distant future.

Indexed as

Arthritis, RheumatoidAnti-Citrullinated Protein AntibodiesAntirheumatic AgentsBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinDisease ProgressionHumansPrognosisRheumatoid FactorAnti-Citrullinated Protein AntibodiesAntirheumatic AgentsBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinRheumatoid Factoranti-TNFbiological agentsjoint damagepredictionprognosisRheumatoid arthritistreatmenttreat-to-target

Identifiers

PMID39798131
PMCPMC11981324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.