Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39797974›Full record

SynthesisArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2025

Precision medicine in diagnosis, prognosis, and disease monitoring of bone and soft tissue sarcomas using liquid biopsy: a systematic review.

Maria Anna Smolle, Markus G Seidel, Karl Kashofer, Bernadette Liegl-Atzwanger, Patrick Sadoghi, Daniel A Müller, Andreas Leithner

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maria Anna SmolleDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 5, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Markus G SeidelResearch Unit for Cancer and Inborn Errors of the Blood and Immunity in Children, Division of Paediatric and Adolescent Haematology/Oncology, Department of Paediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 38, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Karl KashoferDiagnostic and Research Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Neue Stiftingtalstraße 6, 8010, Graz, Austria.
Bernadette Liegl-AtzwangerDiagnostic and Research Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Neue Stiftingtalstraße 6, 8010, Graz, Austria.
Patrick SadoghiDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 5, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Daniel A MüllerBalgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Forchstrasse 340, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland.
Andreas LeithnerDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 5, 8036, Graz, Austria. andreas.leithner@medunigraz.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2598-2325

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLiquid biopsy as a non-invasive method to investigate cancer biology and monitor residual disease has gained significance in clinical practice over the years. Whilst its applicability in carcinomas is well established, the low incidence and heterogeneity of bone and soft tissue sarcomas explains the less well-established knowledge considering liquid biopsy in these highly malignant mesenchymal neoplasms. MATERIALS AND

methodsA systematic literature review adhering to the PRISMA guidelines initially identified 920 studies, of whom 68 original articles could be finally included, all dealing with clinical applicability of liquid biopsy in sarcoma. Studies were discussed within two main chapters, i.e. translocation-associated and complex-karyotype sarcomas.

resultsOverall, data on clinical applicability of liquid biopsy in 2636 patients with > 10 different entities of bone and soft tissue sarcomas could be summarised. The five most frequent tumour entities included osteosarcoma (n = 602), Ewing sarcoma (n = 384), gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST; n = 203), rhabdomyosarcoma (n = 193), and leiomyosarcoma (n = 145). Of 11 liquid biopsy analytes, largest evidence was present for ctDNA and cfDNA, investigated in 26 and 18 studies, respectively.

conclusionsThis systematic literature review provides an extensive up-to-date overview about the current and potential future uses of different liquid biopsy modalities as diagnostic, prognostic, and disease monitoring markers in sarcoma.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsPrecision MedicineSarcomaSoft Tissue NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorHumansLiquid BiopsyOsteosarcomaPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorBone sarcomaCirculating tumour DNALiquid biopsySoft tissue sarcoma

Identifiers

PMID39797974
PMCPMC11724793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.