ArticleClinical and experimental medicine2025
Diagnostic value of glypican-1; a new marker differentiating pulmonary squamous cell carcinoma from adenocarcinoma: immunohistochemical study on Egyptian series.
Article in Clinical and experimental medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lung cancer is one of the major causes of cancer morbidity and mortality. Subtyping of non-small cell lung cancer is necessary owing to different treatment options. This study is to evaluate the value of immunohistochemical expression of glypican-1 in the diagnosis of lung squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). This retrospective study included a total of 68 cases, of which 36 were diagnosed as SCC and 32 as adenocarcinoma (ADC). Furthermore, glypican-1 expression was compared with the expressions of p63, thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF-1), and napsin A. All cases of SCC except one showed positive immunostaining to glypican-1; 35/36 (97.2%) cases, and predominantly scored 3 + . While only 5 cases of ADC showed positive immunostaining to glypican-1, having a score of 1 + or 2 + . The difference between glypican-1 expression of the two tumor types was highly significant (p value < 0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy of glypican-1 expression for differentiating lung SCC from ADC were 97.2%, 84.4%, and 91.2%, respectively. The sensitivity of glypican-1 is more than p63 in the diagnosis of lung SCC. Glypican-1 can be added as a new diagnostic marker to help in the accurate discrimination between poorly differentiated lung SCC and solid predominant adenocarcinoma cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.