Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39797943›Full record

ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2025

Postgraduate medical education in obstetrics and gynecology in Switzerland in comparison to Germany and Austria: the results of an international survey.

Benedict Krischer, Ruth Brechbühl-Litzel, Georg-Daniel Breuer, Martine Favero, Philipp Foessleitner, Anna Margareta Friemann, Martin Weiss, Karin Windsperger, Franziska Winder

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Benedict KrischerFrauenklinik, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland. Benedict.Krischer@luks.ch.
Ruth Brechbühl-LitzelFrauenklinik, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Sursee, Switzerland.
Georg-Daniel BreuerUniversitätsklinikum Tulln, Tulln, Austria.
Martine FaveroPrivate Practice, Schaffhausen, Switzerland.
Philipp FoessleitnerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Obstetrics and Feto-Maternal Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Anna Margareta FriemannDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Municipal Clinical Center Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Martin WeissDepartment of Women's Health, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Karin WindspergerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Obstetrics and Feto-Maternal Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Franziska WinderFrauenklinik Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is frequent academic exchange between Switzerland, Germany and Austria, facilitated by the common language. Additionally, the postgraduate training curricula in obstetrics and gynecology show some similarities. We aimed to compare self-perceived level of ability, availability of simulation training and teaching and feedback culture among residents in obstetrics and gynecology in Switzerland, Germany, and Austria. The focus was on Switzerland to gain a better understanding of strengths and room for improvement.

methodsWith a cross-sectional design, a web-based survey with 30 questions was distributed to obstetrics and gynecology residents in the three countries in August and September 2020. The primary outcome was the self-perception of skills in between-country comparisons of mid-training trainees, i.e., omitting trainees in their first year as well as very advanced trainees and specialists. The secondary outcomes were reported teaching, simulation training and feedback culture. German and Austrian responses were calculated together and compared with the Swiss replies.

resultsA total of 422 participants took part in the survey, 27.5% (n = 116) of whom were from Switzerland, corresponding to a questionnaire response rate of approximately 19%. 48% of Swiss trainees were in training years 2-5. 57% of Swiss participants felt confident in obstetric procedures and 69% in gynecological procedures, compared to 52% and 68% of non-Swiss participants (p = 0.005 and p = 0.176, respectively). Swiss participants felt significantly more confident in performing gynecological than obstetric procedures (p = 0.015). A total of 63% of the Swiss participants had obstetric simulation training, and 28% had gynecological simulation training compared to 37% and 17% in Germany and Austria, respectively (p < 0.001 and p = 0.007). 56% of Swiss participants reported "sufficient structured teaching", 43% reported a "good teaching culture", 47% of Swiss participants stated that they received regular feedback.

conclusionsThe majority of trainees in Switzerland feel confident in a range of procedures and interventions. Simulation training is relatively widespread, although in particular surgical simulation training should be expanded. Clinical teaching and feedback culture should be strengthened. "Teach the teacher" courses should be encouraged to promote a sustainable feedback culture.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceEducation, Medical, GraduateGynecologyInternship and ResidencyObstetricsAdultAustriaCross-Sectional StudiesCurriculumFemaleGermanyHumansMaleSimulation TrainingSurveys and QuestionnairesSwitzerlandGynecologyMedical educationObstetricsPostgraduateSwitzerland

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.