ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2025
Comparative analysis of imaging and pathological features in diagnosis of endometrial carcinosarcoma based on multimodal MRI.
Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis case report aims to present a rare case of endometrial carcinosarcoma, a highly malignant tumor with a poor prognosis. The primary objective is to describe this unique case's clinical presentation, multimodal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features, typical histopathological characteristics and surgical treatment.
methodsA detailed analysis of the patient's medical history, preoperative imaging evaluation, and treatment approach was conducted. This case report includes high-resolution images and figures, showcasing MRI scans, surgical treatment, and histopathology slides related to the case.
resultsThe case report outlines imaging findings of a rare case of endometrial carcinosarcoma. Multimodal imaging such as T1-weighted imaging (T1WI), T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and multi-b-value diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) scanning could accurately identify the histopathological features of the case. Surgical resection is the best treatment, and preoperative imaging evaluation should be particularly important.
conclusionThis case report highlights endometrial carcinosarcoma's rarity and diagnostic challenges. Multimodal MRI has significant value in diagnosing endometrial carcinosarcoma. This technology not only improves the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of diagnosis, but also helps to more accurately evaluate the staging and grading of tumors. By comparing imaging features and pathological results, studies have found that multimodal MRI can clearly show the anatomical structure, pathological nature, and extent of the tumor, with a high degree of consistency with the pathological diagnosis. In particular, when differentiating endometrial carcinosarcoma from low-risk endometrial cancer, multimodal MRI combined with serum carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) and E-box binding zinc finger protein 1 (ZEB1) detection can further improve the sensitivity and specificity of differential diagnosis. In addition, research has found that the ADC value of the tumor tissue in different pathological grades is related to the multimodal MRI, which helps to better understand the biological behavior and prognosis of the tumor. In summary, multimodal MRI is an effective diagnostic tool that can provide important evidence for the precise diagnosis and treatment of endometrial carcinosarcoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39797941What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.