Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39797918›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of medicine2025

Effects of different approaches of infraclavicular brachial plexus block on perfusion index and tissue perfusion.

Çağdaş Baytar, Bengü Gülhan Köksal

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04764591 (Effect of Different Approaches of Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block on Tissue Perfusion), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04764591 nacompletednot on this map

Effect of Different Approaches of Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block on Tissue Perfusion: A Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorZonguldak Bulent Ecevit UniversityRan2022 to 2022Enrolled60ConditionsUpper Extremity Fracture, Regional Anesthesia, Brachial Plexus Blocks, Perfusion IndexArmsLateral sagittal approach, Costoclavicular approach
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Çağdaş BaytarDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University Medicine Faculty, Zonguldak, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-7872-9676
Bengü Gülhan KöksalDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University Medicine Faculty, Zonguldak, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-1324-6144

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough both the lateral sagittal and costoclavicular approaches are applied at the cord level in the infraclavicular region, there is a major difference between the distributions of the two approaches. We aimed to investigate the effects of this different distribution on tissue perfusion and oxygenation.

methodsSixty patients undergoing elective elbow, forearm, wrist and hand surgery under infraclavicular brachial plexus block were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups: group CC (costoclavicular approach,

resultsThe PI and StO

conclusionsThe different distributions of the two different approaches to infraclavicular brachial plexus block, costoclavicular and lateral sagittal, did not have an additional effect on tissue perfusion and oxygenation. Both approaches can be preferred especially in surgeries in which an increase in tissue perfusion is desired owing to perfusion-enhancing properties. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT04764591.

Indexed as

Brachial PlexusBrachial Plexus BlockPerfusion IndexAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOxygen Saturationcostoclavicular approachİnfraclavicular blocklateral sagittal approachperfusion indexsensorimotor blockadetissue oxygen saturation

Identifiers

PMID39797918
PMCPMC11727169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.