ArticleNucleic acids research2025
Evidence for intrinsic DNA dynamics and deformability in damage sensing by the Rad4/XPC nucleotide excision repair complex.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanisms of DNA Damage Recognition by UDG and PARP1 in the Nucleosome.Biomolecules · 2025Article
- The 'very moment' when UDG recognizes a flipped-out uracil base in dsDNA.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Altered DNA dynamics at lesion sites are implicated in how DNA repair proteins sense damage within genomic DNA. Using laser temperature-jump (T-jump) spectroscopy combined with cytosine-analog Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) probes that sense local DNA conformations, we measured the intrinsic dynamics of DNA containing 3 base-pair mismatches recognized in vitro by Rad4 (yeast ortholog of XPC). Rad4/XPC recognizes diverse lesions from environmental mutagens and initiates nucleotide excision repair. T-jump measurements, together with a novel and rigorous comparison with equilibrium FRET, uncovered conformational dynamics spanning multiple timescales and revealed key differences between Rad4-specific and non-specific DNA. AT-rich non-specific sites (matched or mismatched) exhibited dynamics primarily within the T-jump observation window, albeit with some amplitude in 'missing' fast (<20 μs) kinetics. These fast-kinetics amplitudes were dramatically larger for specific sites (CCC/CCC and TTT/TTT), which also exhibited 'missing' slow (>50 ms) kinetics at elevated temperatures, unseen in non-specific sites. We posit that the rapid (μs-ms) intrinsic DNA fluctuations help stall a diffusing protein at AT-rich/damaged sites and that the >50-ms kinetics in specific DNA reflect a propensity to adopt unwound/bent conformations resembling Rad4-bound DNA structures. These studies provide compelling evidence for sequence/structure-dependent intrinsic DNA dynamics and deformability that likely govern damage sensing by Rad4.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.