Trial reportJournal of foot and ankle research2025
Measurement of plantar pressure differences in the contralateral limb when using offloading modalities for diabetic foot ulcerations.
Trial report in Journal of foot and ankle research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study investigated the effect of various offloading devices commonly used for the management of diabetic foot ulcerations on peak plantar pressure and pressure-time integral of the contralateral limb.
methodsA quantitative, randomised and within-subject repeated measures study was conducted in an outpatient gait laboratory. Outpatients with unilateral diabetic foot ulcers and adequate perfusion to the lower limb without an intrinsic limb-length discrepancy who were able to walk were recruited for the study. They were also required to understand English. An in-shoe pressure sensor was placed in the participants' everyday shoes between their feet and insoles. Participants were asked to walk at their own speed and cadences with three stances recorded. Their peak and mean plantar pressures were recorded. This was repeated with four different offloading conditions: Darco APB™ All Purpose Boot, Darco APB™ All Purpose Boot with wool felt adhered to the bottom of the foot, DH Offloading Walker® and DH Offloading Walker® with Even-Up™ on the contralateral foot.
resultsThe total sample comprised 22 adults (3 females and 19 males) aged between 34 and 78 years old (mean age, 57.6 ± 9.9 years). The results indicated that none of the regions of the foot showed a statistically significant difference in peak plantar pressure and pressure-time integral between the control condition and other offloading modalities, or between modalities.
conclusionThe use of offloading modalities for diabetic foot ulcers does not significantly affect peak plantar pressure or pressure-time integral measures on the contralateral limb. However, this should be considered with caution, as this population will possess the same risk factors in both the affected and the contralateral foot.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.