ArticleBMJ open quality2024
Value-based healthcare for social insurance medicine: key enablers for adoption in practice.
Article in BMJ open quality, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Involving Health Care Professionals in the Human-Centered Design of a Digital Platform for Work-Focused Health Care: Lessons From a Mixed Methods Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Usability and added value of the Value@WORK-Q23: insights from user testing of a standard set of key work-related outcomes for patients with cardiovascular diseases in real-life consultations.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Development of a standard set of key work-related outcomes for use in practice for patients with cardiovascular disease: a modified Delphi study.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDriven by rising retirement age and increasing prevalence of chronic diseases impacting work participation, there is an increasing need for quality and efficiency improvement in social insurance medicine (SIM). SIM provides guidance to individuals facing long-term work disability, assess their functional abilities and eligibility for long-term disability benefits. Value-based healthcare (VBHC) targets quality and efficiency improvements in healthcare by placing a priority on improving patient value. So far, VBHC has been introduced with fundamental principles and essential components for its adoption in curative care. Hence, there is room for debate on what are key enablers for the adoption of value-based SIM. PURPOSE: The study aims to explore key enablers for the adoption of VBHC in the practice of SIM.
methodsIn this exploratory qualitative study, participants consisted of 15 professionals with expertise either in SIM (n=10) or with expertise in the adoption of VBHC in the curative care sector (n=5). Each participant took part in both a semistructured individual interview and a focus group interview. Thematic coding was employed to analyse the data.
resultsSeven key enablers were identified: (1) investigate the meaning and implementation constraints of value in SIM, (2) integrate SIM into work-focused care networks, (3) explore the need and feasibility for specialisation based on functional problems, (4) identify the most important work outcomes for the patient, (5) identify proxy indicators for cost drivers, (6) identify value-driven financial incentives and (7) develop an information technology system to exchange data.
conclusionsThis paper provides understanding of what is needed to adopt value-based SIM. Future research should delve deeper into these seven key enablers to facilitate the adoption of VBHC, and thereby promote value creation in the practice of SIM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.