Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39797658›Full record

SynthesisAddiction (Abingdon, England)2025

What is the impact of sports-related gambling advertising on gambling behaviour? A systematic review.

Ellen McGrane, Robert Pryce, Matt Field, Shangshang Gu, Esther C Moore, Elizabeth Goyder

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ellen McGraneSheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4397-3462
Robert PryceSheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4853-0719
Matt FieldDepartment of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7790-5559
Shangshang GuSheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Esther C MooreSheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Elizabeth GoyderSheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 224852/Z/21/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsGambling is a public health issue and widespread advertising of gambling products may contribute to gambling harms. Sports-related gambling advertising includes advertising around sports games or for sports betting products. This review aimed to provide the most systematic and up-to-date review of the literature on the association between sports-related gambling advertising and gambling behaviour.

methodsA systematic literature search of quantitative studies up to 13 February 2024 was undertaken following PRISMA guidelines. Inclusion criteria were quantitative studies published in the English language exploring the association between sports-related gambling advertising and gambling behaviour. Traditional database searches (Medline, Scopus, PsychInfo, Web of Science, CINAHL and The Cochrane Library) were undertaken alongside citation, author and website searches. Studies were narratively synthesised, and the overall quality of the evidence was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT).

resultsTwenty-two studies were included in this review covering traditional, digital, direct, embedded, inducement and aggregate advertising. The majority (n = 16) of research was undertaken in Australia on adult populations. Results suggest that sports-related gambling advertising is associated with increases in perceived, intended and actual frequency of (n = 6 studies) and expenditure on (n = 3) gambling, unplanned or unintended gambling (n = 2), the likelihood of gambling (n = 2), the likelihood of using a sponsor's product (n = 2) and, in some cases, the complexity or riskiness of bets placed (n = 2). Studies suggest that the self-reported effect may be more pronounced in higher-risk gamblers (n = 7). Preliminary evidence suggests that specific inducements which reduce the riskiness or cost of gambling appear to be particularly influential (n = 3). Limitations of the evidence base include the lack of standardised measures and use of observational designs.

conclusionsExposure to sports-related gambling advertising appears to be associated with increased gambling behaviour for a wide range of advertising media. This association may be more pronounced in higher-risk gamblers who are already at increased risk of harm.

Indexed as

AdvertisingGamblingSportsAustraliaHumansadvertisingbehaviourgamblingpolicypublic healthsportssystematic review

Identifiers

PMID39797658
PMCPMC11907332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.