Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39797532›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association2025

Rural nonprofit hospital community benefit and financial assistance spending: A call for greater reporting transparency.

Hannah MacDougall, Melissa Latcham, Erica Eliason

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Rural nonprofit hospital community benefit and financial assistance spending: A call for greater reporting transparency.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hannah MacDougallDepartment/School of Social Work, School of Social Work, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7124-3913
Melissa LatchamDepartment/School of Social Work, School of Social Work, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA.
Erica EliasonMelissa Latcham and School of Public Health, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.

Funding

The Effects of the Medicaid Continuous Coverage Requirement during the Public Health Emergency on Postpartum Coverage and Maternal and Infant Care after ChildbirthR00HD111622 · NICHD · RUTGERS BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Erica L Eliason · 2024 to 2026
$747k
The Effects of the Medicaid Continuous Coverage Requirement during the Public Health Emergency on Postpartum Coverage and Maternal and Infant Care after ChildbirthK99HD111622 · NICHD · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI ELIASON, ERICA L · 2023 to 2024
$228k
NICHD K99 #1K99HD111622NICHD NIH HHS K99 HD111622NICHD NIH HHS R00 HD111622The University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station FundUSDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture MIN-55-086
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeUS nonprofit hospitals must provide community benefits including financial assistance to be tax-exempt. Rural residents particularly benefit from financial assistance because they have higher medical debt on average. The Internal Revenue Service allows nonprofit hospitals that are members of health systems to report expenditures for their entire system (group returns) rather than for individual hospitals. Our study examined how (if at all) rural nonprofit hospitals filing group returns are different than those filing individual returns.

methodsWe used 2021 data extracted from Community Benefit Insight and the American Hospital Association for 100 rural nonprofit hospitals in Wisconsin and Minnesota. We conducted bivariate analyses examining differences in mean total community benefit spending and mean financial assistance spending as a percentage of total operating expenses for hospitals filing individual versus group returns. We conducted multivariable regression models examining the association of filing group returns and individual returns with community benefit spending and financial assistance spending.

findingsBivariate analysis revealed significant differences between group return hospitals and individual return hospitals in spending on community benefits (5.81% vs. 9.49%, respectively) and on financial assistance (0.36% vs. 0.71% respectively). Multivariable regression demonstrated filing group returns is significantly negatively associated with community benefit expenditures (β = -2.90, p < 0.05) and financial assistance expenditures (β = -0.31, p < 0.01).

conclusionIn our sample, filing group returns was associated with less spending on community benefits and financial assistance. To understand this finding, researchers need data on individual hospital spending to increase transparency and accountability.

Indexed as

Hospitals, RuralOrganizations, NonprofitHumansMinnesotaTax ExemptionUnited StatesWisconsincommunity benefitsfinancial assistancehospitalmedical debtrural

Identifiers

PMID39797532
PMCPMC11724223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.