Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39797467›Full record

ReviewSmall methods2026

Self-Driving Microscopes: AI Meets Super-Resolution Microscopy.

Edward N Ward, Anna Scheeder, Max Barysevich, Clemens F Kaminski

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Small methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Edward N WardDept. Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB3 0AS, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9078-9716
Anna ScheederDept. Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB3 0AS, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0042-6578
Max BarysevichDept. Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB3 0AS, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9686-5962
Clemens F KaminskiDept. Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB3 0AS, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5194-0962

Funding

Centre for Doctoral Training in Sensor Technologies and Applications EP/H018301/1Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/H018301/1NanoDTC ESPSRC EP/S022953/1UKRI EPSRC grants EP/ L015889/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 089703/Z/09/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The integration of Machine Learning (ML) with super-resolution microscopy represents a transformative advancement in biomedical research. Recent advances in ML, particularly deep learning (DL), have significantly enhanced image processing tasks, such as denoising and reconstruction. This review explores the growing potential of automation in super-resolution microscopy, focusing on how DL can enable autonomous imaging tasks. Overcoming the challenges of automation, particularly in adapting to dynamic biological processes and minimizing manual intervention, is crucial for the future of microscopy. Whilst still in its infancy, automation in super-resolution can revolutionize drug discovery and disease phenotyping leading to similar breakthroughs as have been recognized in this year's Nobel Prizes for Physics and Chemistry.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedMicroscopyAutomationDeep LearningHumansMachine Learningdeep learningmachine learningmicroscopysuper‐resolution

Identifiers

PMID39797467
PMCPMC12825358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.