Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39797389›Full record

Trial reportMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2025

Assessing Caries Removal Efficacy and Pain Perception in Children, Using Smart Bur Versus Carbide Bur: A Randomized Clinical Study.

Satish Vishwanathaiah, Prabhadevi C Maganur, Shahad Mohammed Maafa, Asayil Mohammed Tulays, May Mohammed Hakami, Nassreen H Albar, Noura Alessa, Khalid Alhakami, Ali Ahmed Assiry, Amjad Ismail Alfaqih and 1 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Satish VishwanathaiahDepartment of Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-8376-297X
Prabhadevi C MaganurDepartment of Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-0959-2597
Shahad Mohammed MaafaCollege of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Asayil Mohammed TulaysCollege of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
May Mohammed HakamiCollege of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Nassreen H AlbarRestorative Dentistry Department, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-8163-4712
Noura AlessaDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, Dental College, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-1354-9807
Khalid AlhakamiDepartment of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz Medical City of National Guard Health Affairs, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0009-0002-6294-8772
Ali Ahmed AssiryDepartment of Preventive Dental Sciences, Najran University, Najran, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-3229-0503
Amjad Ismail AlfaqihCollege of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0009-0007-3932-4263
Ather Ahmed SyedDepartment of Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-5278-1385

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Dental caries removal is conventionally done using carbide burs, but non-metallic polymer burs have recently been developed with the aim of being more selective and causing less pain. The objective of the study is to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of caries removal, time taken, and patient compliance during restorations using smart bur and carbide burs in pediatric patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS A clinical study was designed and conducted at the Pedodontics Outpatient Department, with a focus on 40 children between 6 and 12 years old, who were split into 2 groups consisting of 20 children each: group 1, using a carbide conventional rotary bur, and group 2, using a smart bur. Efficiency of caries removal was assessed using the Ericson scale. The Face Leg Activity Cry Consolability (FLACC) and Wong-Baker FACES pain rating scale (WBS) were used to assess the intensity of pain, and the behavior of children was assessed using the Frankel behavior rating scale (FBRS). RESULTS A statistically significant difference (P<0.001) was noted in the time taken for caries excavation and Ericson scale (P=0.04), with higher scores observed in the smart bur group. The smart bur group generally reported lower WBS and FLACC scores than the carbide bur group, during caries excavation, restoration and local anesthesia administration, and this difference was very highly significant (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Pain perception among children was lesser and overall satisfaction was higher in smart bur group whereas caries removal efficiency was higher in conventional carbide bur group.

Indexed as

Dental CariesDental Cavity PreparationPain PerceptionChildFemaleHumansMalePainPain MeasurementTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID39797389
PMCPMC11737275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.