ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Optimizing Mechanical Ventilation: A Clinical and Practical Bedside Method for the Identification and Management of Patient-Ventilator Asynchronies in Critical Care.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Challenges and strategies for the identification and correction of patient-ventilator asynchronies in daily practice: a scoping review.Acute and critical care · 2026Article
- When the ventilator and the patient disagree: a Delphi roadmap to clarity.Intensive care medicine · 2026Article
- Development of a deep-learning model for classification of intensivists' extubation decisions using ventilator graphic monitor images: a prospective observational study.Journal of intensive care · 2026Article
- Ventilatory asynchronies induced by routine clinical practices in the intensive care unit: A systematic observation combined with a scoping review.Canadian journal of respiratory therapy : CJRT = Revue canadienne de la therapie respiratoire : RCTR · 2026Article
- Biot's respiratory pattern under mechanical ventilation: Two case reports and literature review.Respiratory medicine case reports · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prompt identification and correction of patient-ventilator asynchronies (PVA) remain a cornerstone for ensuring the quality of respiratory failure treatment and the prevention of further injury to critically ill patients. These disruptions, whether due to over- or under-assistance, have a profound clinical impact not only on the respiratory mechanics and the mortality associated with mechanical ventilation but also on the patient's cardiac output and hemodynamic profile. Strong evidence has demonstrated that these frequently occurring and often underdiagnosed events have significant prognostic value for mechanical ventilation outcomes and are strongly associated with prolonged ICU stays and hospital mortality. Halting the consequences of PVA relies on the correct identification and approach of its underlying causes. However, this often requires advanced knowledge of respiratory physiology and the evaluation of complex ventilator waveforms in patient-ventilator interactions, posing a challenge to intensive care practitioners, in particular, those less experienced. This review aims to outline the most frequent types of PVA and propose a clinical algorithm to provide physicians with a structured approach to assess, accurately diagnose, and correct PVA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.