ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
How We Treat ANCA-Associated Vasculitis: A Focus on the Maintenance Therapy.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical and Echocardiographic Predictors of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in ANCA-Associated Vasculitis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Review
- Current Diagnosis and Treatment of Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis: A Review Including a Comparison of Characteristics in Europe and Japan.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- ANCA-associated vasculitis in the United Arab Emirates: a 17-year case series with review from Gulf literature.Annals of Saudi medicineObservational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent progress has notably improved outcomes for patients with anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis (AAV), namely granulomatosis with polyangiitis and microscopic polyangiitis. Since 2021, several international scientific societies have recommended rituximab (RTX) as the preferred primary treatment for maintaining remission in AAV patients. Decisions regarding retreatment with RTX are based on individual patient risk factors for disease flare-ups and the potential consequences of such flares. In reviewing available evidence and reporting our experiences at G. Bosco Hub Hospital in Turin, Italy, we explore various trials focusing on the maintenance therapy in AAV and discuss areas of unmet need.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.