ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
From Cell Interactions to Bedside Practice: Complete Blood Count-Derived Biomarkers with Diagnostic and Prognostic Potential in Venous Thromboembolism.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Inflammatory biomarkers in cerebral venous thrombosis versus ischemic stroke: a network meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Article
- Evaluation of Systemic Inflammatory Indices in Pregnant Women With Deep Vein Thrombosis.American journal of reproductive immunology (New York, N.Y. : 1989) · 2026Article
- From Algorithms to Biomarkers: Toward Personalized Management of Venous Thromboembolism.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Smart Thrombosis Care: The Rise of Closed-Loop Diagnosis-to-Treatment Nano Systems.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Venous thromboembolism (VTE), encompassing deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, is a significant burden on health and economic systems worldwide. Improved VTE management calls for the integration of biomarkers into diagnostic algorithms and scoring systems for risk assessment, possible complications, and mortality. This literature review discusses novel biomarkers with potential diagnostic and prognostic value in personalized VTE management. The pathophysiology of thrombosis starts with cell interactions in the vascular environment and continues with more complex, recently discussed processes such as immunothrombosis and thromboinflammation. Their clinical applicability is in the use of complete blood count (CBC)-derived immuno-inflammatory indices as attractive, readily available biomarkers that reflect pro-thrombotic states. Indices such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR = neutrophil count divided by lymphocyte count), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR = platelet count divided by lymphocyte count), and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII = NLR multiplied by platelet count) have demonstrated predictive value for thromboembolic events. Nevertheless, confounding data regarding cutoffs that may be implemented in clinical practice limit their applicability. This literature review aims to investigate neutrophil and platelet interactions as key drivers of immunothrombosis and thromboinflammation while summarizing the relevant research on the corresponding CBC-derived biomarkers, as well as their potential utility in day-to-day clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.