ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2024
Echocardiography in the Ventilated Patient: What the Clinician Has to Know.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Developing a comprehensive haemodynamic ultrasound assessment for critical care: Rationale and methodology from the FUSIC programme.Journal of the Intensive Care Society · 2026Article
- Point-of-care ultrasound to evaluate volume status in congestive heart failure.Journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026Review
- Pressure-Adjusted Heart Rate by Echocardiography and Mortality in the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Right ventricular-protective ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome: phenotypes, monitoring and ventilatory management.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026Review
- Cardiac Tamponade Under Positive-Pressure Ventilation: Pathophysiological Insights and Implications for Diagnosis.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Review
- Automated assessment of right ventricular systolic function from coronary angiograms with video-based artificial intelligence algorithms: development, validation, comparison against humans, and prospective deployment.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Article
- Individualized Perioperative PEEP in Older Surgical Patients: A Three-Dimensional Titration Framework.Clinical interventions in aging · 2026Review
- Inter-rater reliability of point-of-care ultrasound during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: an ancillary analysis of the observational prospective ACE trial.Resuscitation plus · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heart and lung sharing the same anatomical space are influenced by each other. Spontaneous breathing induces dynamic changes in intrathoracic pressure, impacting cardiac function, particularly the right ventricle. In intensive care units (ICU), mechanical ventilation (MV) and therefore positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) are often applied, and this inevitably influences cardiac function. In ventilated patients, the use of positive pressures leads to an increase in intrathoracic pressure and, consequently, to a reduction in the right ventricular preload and thus cardiac output. The clinician working in the intensive care unit must be able to assess the effects MV has on the heart in order to set it up appropriately and to manage any complications. The echocardiographic evaluation of the ventilated patient has the main purpose of studying the right ventricle; in fact, they are the ones most affected by PEEP. It is therefore necessary to assess the size, thickness, and systolic function of the right ventricle. In the mechanically ventilated patient, it may be difficult to assess the volemic status and fluid responsiveness, in fact, the study of the inferior vena cava (IVC) is not always reliable in these patients. In patients with MV, it is preferable to assess fluid responsiveness with dynamic methods such as the end-expiration occlusion (EEO) test, passive leg raise (PLR), and fluid challenge (FC). The study of the diaphragm is also essential to identify possible complications, manage weaning, and provide important prognostic information. This review describes the basis for echocardiographic evaluation of the mechanically ventilated patient with the aim of supporting the clinician in managing the consequences of MV for heart-lung interaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.