ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2024
Accuracy of Full-Arch Intraoral Scans Versus Conventional Impression: A Systematic Review with a Meta-Analysis and a Proposal to Standardise the Analysis of the Accuracy.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Influence of arch form on the accuracy of digital workflow in all-on-four implant rehabilitation cases (an in vitro study).BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Dimensional accuracy of dental impression materials evaluated using a standardized CAD based method across materials tray types and techniques.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Accuracy of complete-arch digital implant impressions using conventional scanbodies, ScanTransfers, and splinted ScanTransfers: an in vitro study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Implant‑position reproducibility of wired and wireless intraoral scanners and the effects of Wi‑Fi distance and upload speed: an in vitro study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Review
- Snap-On PMMA Provisional Restorations in a Full Digital Workflow for the Rehabilitation of Worn Dentition: A Clinical Report.Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Digital Imaging Accuracy Among Three Intraoral Scanners for Full-Arch Implant Rehabilitation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Marginal and internal fit accuracy of single-crown restorations: the impact of digital and conventional impression techniques.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Standardizing Methodologies in Prosthodontics to Improve Research Reliability and Peer Review Efficiency: A Perspective-Based Proposal.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Effects of inter-implant tooth loss and scan body material on digital impression accuracy: an in vitro study.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Marginal Bone Level Changes in Full-Arch Rehabilitation: Digital Versus Analog Protocols-A 5-Year Retrospective Study.Clinical implant dentistry and related research · 2025Article
- Integrating 3D Digital Technology Advancements in the Fabrication of Orthodontic Aligner Attachments: An In Vitro Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Enhancing Intraoral Scanning Accuracy: From the Influencing Factors to a Procedural Guideline.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Advances and Challenges in the Integration of Digital Technologies in Complete Dentures: A Narrative Literature Review.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2025Review
- Chairside digital workflow to obtain an optimized 3D model of a partially edentulous mandible.Frontiers in oral health · 2025Article
- Comparison of dental surface of canine teeth in dogs after crown preparation using CBCT-based surface reconstruction or conventional dental impression materials.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- Comparison of the accuracy of conventional impression technique and an intraoral scanning system after crown preparation in canine teeth of dogs: a cadaver study.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.