ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
A Comparison Study of Person Identification Using IR Array Sensors and LiDAR.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exploring Nutrient Deficiencies in Lettuce Crops: Utilizing Advanced Multidimensional Image Analysis for Precision Diagnosis.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Person identification is a critical task in applications such as security and surveillance, requiring reliable systems that perform robustly under diverse conditions. This study evaluates the Vision Transformer (ViT) and ResNet34 models across three modalities-RGB, thermal, and depth-using datasets collected with infrared array sensors and LiDAR sensors in controlled scenarios and varying resolutions (16 × 12 to 640 × 480) to explore their effectiveness in person identification. Preprocessing techniques, including YOLO-based cropping, were employed to improve subject isolation. Results show a similar identification performance between the three modalities, in particular in high resolution (i.e., 640 × 480), with RGB image classification reaching 100.0%, depth images reaching 99.54% and thermal images reaching 97.93%. However, upon deeper investigation, thermal images show more robustness and generalizability by maintaining focus on subject-specific features even at low resolutions. In contrast, RGB data performs well at high resolutions but exhibits reliance on background features as resolution decreases. Depth data shows significant degradation at lower resolutions, suffering from scattered attention and artifacts. These findings highlight the importance of modality selection, with thermal imaging emerging as the most reliable. Future work will explore multi-modal integration, advanced preprocessing, and hybrid architectures to enhance model adaptability and address current limitations. This study highlights the potential of thermal imaging and the need for modality-specific strategies in designing robust person identification systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.