Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39797004›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

A Comprehensive Survey of Machine Learning Techniques and Models for Object Detection.

Maria Trigka, Elias Dritsas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Maria TrigkaIndustrial Systems Institute, Athena Research and Innovation Center, 26504 Patras, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-7793-0407
Elias DritsasIndustrial Systems Institute, Athena Research and Innovation Center, 26504 Patras, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-5647-2929

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Object detection is a pivotal research domain within computer vision, with applications spanning from autonomous vehicles to medical diagnostics. This comprehensive survey presents an in-depth analysis of the evolution and significant advancements in object detection, emphasizing the critical role of machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) techniques. We explore a wide spectrum of methodologies, ranging from traditional approaches to the latest DL models, thoroughly evaluating their performance, strengths, and limitations. Additionally, the survey delves into various metrics for assessing model effectiveness, including precision, recall, and intersection over union (IoU), while addressing ongoing challenges in the field, such as managing occlusions, varying object scales, and improving real-time processing capabilities. Furthermore, we critically examine recent breakthroughs, including advanced architectures like Transformers, and discuss challenges and future research directions aimed at overcoming existing barriers. By synthesizing current advancements, this survey provides valuable insights for enhancing the robustness, accuracy, and efficiency of object detection systems across diverse and challenging applications.

Indexed as

deep learningmachine learningmodelsobject detectiontechniques

Identifiers

PMID39797004
PMCPMC11723456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.