Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39797002›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Analysis of Autonomous Penetration Testing Through Reinforcement Learning and Recommender Systems.

Ariadna Claudia Moreno, Aldo Hernandez-Suarez, Gabriel Sanchez-Perez, Linda Karina Toscano-Medina, Hector Perez-Meana, Jose Portillo-Portillo, Jesus Olivares-Mercado, Luis Javier García Villalba

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ariadna Claudia MorenoInstituto Politecnico Nacional, ESIME Culhuacan, Mexico City 04440, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-4705-9929
Aldo Hernandez-SuarezInstituto Politecnico Nacional, ESIME Culhuacan, Mexico City 04440, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-4867-2717
Gabriel Sanchez-PerezInstituto Politecnico Nacional, ESIME Culhuacan, Mexico City 04440, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-4735-205X
Linda Karina Toscano-MedinaInstituto Politecnico Nacional, ESIME Culhuacan, Mexico City 04440, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-9555-4705
Hector Perez-MeanaInstituto Politecnico Nacional, ESIME Culhuacan, Mexico City 04440, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-7786-2050
Jose Portillo-PortilloInstituto Politecnico Nacional, ESIME Culhuacan, Mexico City 04440, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-8863-7804
Jesus Olivares-MercadoInstituto Politecnico Nacional, ESIME Culhuacan, Mexico City 04440, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-0337-5364
Luis Javier García VillalbaGroup of Analysis, Security and Systems (GASS), Department of Software Engineering and Artificial Intelligence (DISIA), Faculty of Computer Science and Engineering, Office 431, Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM), Calle Profesor José García Santesmases, 9, Ciudad Universitaria, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7573-6272

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conducting penetration testing (pentesting) in cybersecurity is a crucial turning point for identifying vulnerabilities within the framework of Information Technology (IT), where real malicious offensive behavior is simulated to identify potential weaknesses and strengthen preventive controls. Given the complexity of the tests, time constraints, and the specialized level of expertise required for pentesting, analysis and exploitation tools are commonly used. Although useful, these tools often introduce uncertainty in findings, resulting in high rates of false positives. To enhance the effectiveness of these tests, Machine Learning (ML) has been integrated, showing significant potential for identifying anomalies across various security areas through detailed detection of underlying malicious patterns. However, pentesting environments are unpredictable and intricate, requiring analysts to make extensive efforts to understand, explore, and exploit them. This study considers these challenges, proposing a recommendation system based on a context-rich, vocabulary-aware transformer capable of processing questions related to the target environment and offering responses based on necessary pentest batteries evaluated by a Reinforcement Learning (RL) estimator. This RL component assesses optimal attack strategies based on previously learned data and dynamically explores additional attack vectors. The system achieved an F1 score and an Exact Match rate over 97.0%, demonstrating its accuracy and effectiveness in selecting relevant pentesting strategies.

Indexed as

penetration testingrecommender systemsreinforcement learning

Identifiers

PMID39797002
PMCPMC11723266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.