ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Analysis of Autonomous Penetration Testing Through Reinforcement Learning and Recommender Systems.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Conducting penetration testing (pentesting) in cybersecurity is a crucial turning point for identifying vulnerabilities within the framework of Information Technology (IT), where real malicious offensive behavior is simulated to identify potential weaknesses and strengthen preventive controls. Given the complexity of the tests, time constraints, and the specialized level of expertise required for pentesting, analysis and exploitation tools are commonly used. Although useful, these tools often introduce uncertainty in findings, resulting in high rates of false positives. To enhance the effectiveness of these tests, Machine Learning (ML) has been integrated, showing significant potential for identifying anomalies across various security areas through detailed detection of underlying malicious patterns. However, pentesting environments are unpredictable and intricate, requiring analysts to make extensive efforts to understand, explore, and exploit them. This study considers these challenges, proposing a recommendation system based on a context-rich, vocabulary-aware transformer capable of processing questions related to the target environment and offering responses based on necessary pentest batteries evaluated by a Reinforcement Learning (RL) estimator. This RL component assesses optimal attack strategies based on previously learned data and dynamically explores additional attack vectors. The system achieved an F1 score and an Exact Match rate over 97.0%, demonstrating its accuracy and effectiveness in selecting relevant pentesting strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.