ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Vision Sensor for Automatic Recognition of Human Activities via Hybrid Features and Multi-Class Support Vector Machine.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Evaluation of Automatic Detection and Classification of Daily Living Activities Using Batch Learning and Stream Learning Algorithms.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Article
- Intelligent biosensors for human movement rehabilitation and intention recognition.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- A novel multi-modal rehabilitation monitoring over human motion intention recognition.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over recent years, automated Human Activity Recognition (HAR) has been an area of concern for many researchers due to its widespread application in surveillance systems, healthcare environments, and many more. This has led researchers to develop coherent and robust systems that efficiently perform HAR. Although there have been many efficient systems developed to date, still, there are many issues to be addressed. There are several elements that contribute to the complexity of the task, making it more challenging to detect human activities, i.e., (i) poor lightning conditions; (ii) different viewing angles; (iii) intricate clothing styles; (iv) diverse activities with similar gestures; and (v) limited availability of large datasets. However, through effective feature extraction, we can develop resilient systems for higher accuracies. During feature extraction, we aim to extract unique key body points and full-body features that exhibit distinct attributes for each activity. Our proposed system introduces an innovative approach for the identification of human activity in outdoor and indoor settings by extracting effective spatio-temporal features, along with a Multi-Class Support Vector Machine, which enhances the model's performance to accurately identify the activity classes. The experimental findings show that our model outperforms others in terms of classification, accuracy, and generalization, indicating its efficient analysis on benchmark datasets. Various performance metrics, including mean recognition accuracy, precision, F1 score, and recall assess the effectiveness of our model. The assessment findings show a remarkable recognition rate of around 88.61%, 87.33, 86.5%, and 81.25% on the BIT-Interaction dataset, UT-Interaction dataset, NTU RGB + D 120 dataset, and PKUMMD dataset, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.