ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Gripping Success Metric for Robotic Fruit Harvesting.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Task-Parceling and Synchronous Retrieval Scheme for Twin-Arm Orchard Apple Tree Automaton.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Event-Triggered Secure Control Design Against False Data Injection Attacks via Lyapunov-Based Neural Networks.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recently, computer vision methods have been widely applied to agricultural tasks, such as robotic harvesting. In particular, fruit harvesting robots often rely on object detection or segmentation to identify and localize target fruits. During the model selection process for object detection, the average precision (AP) score typically provides the de facto standard. However, AP is not intuitive for determining which model is most efficient for robotic harvesting. It is based on the intersection-over-union (IoU) of bounding boxes, which reflects only regional overlap. IoU alone cannot reliably predict the success of robotic gripping, as identical IoU scores may yield different results depending on the overlapping shape of the boxes. In this paper, we propose a novel evaluation metric for robotic harvesting. To assess gripping success, our metric uses the center coordinates of bounding boxes and a margin hyperparameter that accounts for the gripper's specifications. We conducted evaluation about popular object detection models on peach and apple datasets. The experimental results showed that the proposed gripping success metric is much more intuitive and helpful in interpreting the performance data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.