Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39796972›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Gripping Success Metric for Robotic Fruit Harvesting.

Dasom Seo, Il-Seok Oh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dasom SeoDepartment of Computer Science & Artificial Intelligence, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju-si 54896, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4654-9846
Il-Seok OhDepartment of Computer Science & Artificial Intelligence, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju-si 54896, Republic of Korea.

Funding

Rural Development Administration RS-2021-RD009224
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, computer vision methods have been widely applied to agricultural tasks, such as robotic harvesting. In particular, fruit harvesting robots often rely on object detection or segmentation to identify and localize target fruits. During the model selection process for object detection, the average precision (AP) score typically provides the de facto standard. However, AP is not intuitive for determining which model is most efficient for robotic harvesting. It is based on the intersection-over-union (IoU) of bounding boxes, which reflects only regional overlap. IoU alone cannot reliably predict the success of robotic gripping, as identical IoU scores may yield different results depending on the overlapping shape of the boxes. In this paper, we propose a novel evaluation metric for robotic harvesting. To assess gripping success, our metric uses the center coordinates of bounding boxes and a margin hyperparameter that accounts for the gripper's specifications. We conducted evaluation about popular object detection models on peach and apple datasets. The experimental results showed that the proposed gripping success metric is much more intuitive and helpful in interpreting the performance data.

Indexed as

AgricultureFruitRoboticsAlgorithmsMaluscomputer visiongrasp detectionobject detectionrobot harvestingrobotic grasping

Identifiers

PMID39796972
PMCPMC11723232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.