Normalization of Retinal Birefringence Scanning Signals.

Boris I Gramatikov, David L Guyton

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Boris I GramatikovOphthalmic Instrumentation Development Lab, The Wilmer Eye Institute, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Wilmer 233, 600 N. Wolfe St., Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.

David L GuytonOphthalmic Instrumentation Development Lab, The Wilmer Eye Institute, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Wilmer 233, 600 N. Wolfe St., Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Signal amplitudes obtained from retinal scanning depend on numerous factors. Working with polarized light to interrogate the retina, large parts of which are birefringent, is even more prone to artifacts. This article demonstrates the necessity of using normalization when working with retinal birefringence scanning signals in polarization-sensitive ophthalmic instruments. After discussing the pros and cons of employing a normalization signal obtained by means of added optoelectronic hardware, the study shifts over and focuses on a numerical normalization method based on merely the

Indexed as

RetinaAlgorithmsBirefringenceHumansophthalmic screening devicespolarization-sensitive systemsretinal birefringence scanningsignal normalization

Identifiers

PMID39796956

DOI10.3390/s25010165

PMCPMC11722846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.