ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Effect of Depth Band Replacement on Red, Green and Blue Image for Deep Learning Weed Detection.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Automated agricultural robots are becoming more common with the decreased cost of sensor devices and increased computational capabilities of single-board computers. Weeding is one of the mundane and repetitive tasks that robots could be used to perform. The detection of weeds in crops is now common, and commercial solutions are entering the market rapidly. However, less work is carried out on combatting weeds in pastures. Weeds decrease the grazing yield of pastures and spread over time. Mowing the remaining weeds after grazing is not guaranteed to remove entrenched weeds. Periodic but selective cutting of weeds can be a solution to this problem. However, many weeds share similar textures and structures with grazing plants, making their detection difficult using the classic RGB (Red, Green, Blue) approach. Pixel depth estimation is considered a viable source of data for weed detection. However, systems utilizing RGBD (RGB plus Depth) are computationally expensive, making them nonviable for small, lightweight robots. Substituting one of the RGB bands with depth data could be a solution to this problem. In this study, we examined the effect of band substitution on the performance of lightweight YOLOv8 models using precision, recall and mAP50 metrics. Overall, the RDB band combination proved to be the best option for YOLOv8 small and medium detection models, with 0.621 and 0.634 mAP50 (for a mean average precision at 50% intersection over union) scores, respectively. In both instances, the classic RGB approach yielded lower accuracies of 0.574 and 0.613.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.