Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39796932›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Impact of Particular Stages of the Manufacturing Process on the Reliability of Flexible Printed Circuits.

Andrzej Kiernich, Jerzy Kalenik, Wojciech Stęplewski, Marek Kościelski, Aneta Chołaj

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andrzej KiernichŁukasiewicz Research Network-Tele and Radio Research Institute, Ratuszowa 11, 03-450 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0009-0005-0507-7220
Jerzy KalenikFaculty of Electronics and Information Technology, Warsaw University of Technology, Nowowiejska 15/19, 00-665 Warsaw, Poland.
Wojciech StęplewskiŁukasiewicz Research Network-Tele and Radio Research Institute, Ratuszowa 11, 03-450 Warsaw, Poland.
Marek KościelskiŁukasiewicz Research Network-Tele and Radio Research Institute, Ratuszowa 11, 03-450 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7733-7726
Aneta ChołajŁukasiewicz Research Network-Tele and Radio Research Institute, Ratuszowa 11, 03-450 Warsaw, Poland.

Funding

President of the Łukasiewicz Center 1/Ł-IEL/CŁ/2022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of the experiment was to indicate which element of the production process of flexible printed circuit boards is optimal in terms of the reliability of final products. According to the Taguchi method, in the experiment, five factors with two levels each were chosen for the subsequent analysis. These included the number of conductive layers, the thickness of the laminate layer, the type of the laminate, the diameter of the plated holes, and the current density in the galvanic bath. The reliability of the PCBs in the produced variations was verified using the Interconnect Stress Test environmental test. The qualitatively best variant of the board construction was indicated using the signal-to-noise ratio and the analysis of variance method for each factor. The factors determined to be the most important in terms of reliability were the number of conductive layers and the current density in the galvanic bath. The optimal variant of the board construction was two conductive layers on a polyimide laminate, where the laminate layer was 100 μm thick, the hole diameter was equal to 0.4 mm, and current density was 2 A/dm

Indexed as

design of experimentenvironmental testsflexible printed circuitInterconnect Stress Testproduction processproduct reliabilityTaguchi method

Identifiers

PMID39796932
PMCPMC11723001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.