ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Improved Intelligent Condition Monitoring with Diagnostic Indicator Selection.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hydraulic Seal Wear Classification by Fine-Tuning a Transformer-Based Audio Model Using Acoustic Emission.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Handling Multi-Source Uncertainty in Accelerated Degradation Through a Wiener-Based Robust Modeling Scheme.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Predictive Maintenance System to RUL Prediction of Li-Ion Batteries and Identify the Fault Type of Brushless DC Electric Motor from UAVs.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this study, a predictive maintenance (PdM) system focused on feature selection for the detection and classification of simulated defects in wind turbine blades has been developed. Traditional PdM systems often rely on numerous, broadly chosen diagnostic indicators derived from vibration data, yet many of these features offer little added value and may even degrade model performance. General feature selection methods might not be suitable for PdM solutions, as information regarding observed faults is often misinterpreted or lost. To address these issues, a structured feature selection method based on correlation analysis supplemented with comprehensive visual evaluation was proposed. Unlike generic dimensionality reduction techniques, this approach preserves critical domain-specific information and avoids misinterpretation of fault indicators. By applying the proposed method, it was possible to successfully filter out redundant features, enabling simpler machine learning (ML) models to match or even surpass the performance of more complex deep learning (DL) architectures. The best results were achieved by a deep neural network trained on the full dataset, with accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score of 97.30%, 97.23%, 97.23%, and 97.23%, respectively, while the top-performing ML model (a voting classifier trained on the reduced dataset) attained scores of 97.13%, 96.99%, 96.95%, and 96.94%. The proposed method for reducing condition indicators successfully decreased their number by approximately 3.27 times, simultaneously significantly reducing computational time of prediction, reaching up to 50% reduction for complex models. In doing so, we lowered computational demands and improved classification efficiency without compromising accuracy for ML models. Although feature reduction did not similarly benefit the metrics for DL models, these findings highlight that well-chosen, domain-relevant condition indicators can streamline data input and deliver interpretable, cost-effective PdM solutions suitable for industrial applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.