ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Implantable Passive Sensors for Biomedical Applications.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reclaiming Anatomy as Method: From Morphological Reasoning to Clinical Relevance.Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Review
- [Computer-assisted sensing in periprosthetic joint infection : Current evidence and future perspectives for wearables].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Smart wearable biosensors: a transformative synergy between diagnosis and treatment of disease.RSC advances · 2026Review
- Anatomy at the threshold: Teaching the human body in a hybrid age.Anatomical sciences education · 2025Article
- Personalized and genetically engineered animal models for next-generation surgical implant validation.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Review
- Advancements in Wearable and Implantable BioMEMS Devices: Transforming Healthcare Through Technology.Micromachines · 2025Review
- Sensor-integrated hip and knee prostheses: advances, challenges, and future perspectives.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, implantable sensors have been extensively researched since they allow localized sensing at an area of interest (e.g., within the vicinity of a surgical site or other implant). They allow unobtrusive and potentially continuous sensing, enabling greater specificity, early warning capabilities, and thus timely clinical intervention. Wireless remote interrogation of the implanted sensor is typically achieved using radio frequency (RF), inductive coupling or ultrasound through an external device. Two categories of implantable sensors are available, namely active and passive. Active sensors offer greater capabilities, such as on-node signal and data processing, multiplexing and multimodal sensing, while also allowing lower detection limits, the possibility to encode patient sensitive information and bidirectional communication. However, they require an energy source to operate. Battery implantation, and maintenance, remains a very important constraint in many implantable applications even though energy can be provided wirelessly through the external device, in some cases. On the other hand, passive sensors offer the possibility of detection without the need for a local energy source or active electronics. They also offer significant advantages in the areas of system complexity, cost and size. In this review, implantable passive sensor technologies will be discussed along with their communication and readout schemes. Materials, detection strategies and clinical applications of passive sensors will be described. Advantages over active sensor technologies will be highlighted, as well as critical aspects related to packaging and biocompatibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.