ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Performance Improvement with Reduced Number of Channels in Motor Imagery BCI System.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Influence of EEG Signal Augmentation Methods on Classification Accuracy of Motor Imagery Events.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- State sensitivity and five-year longitudinal stability of resting-state EEG biomarker candidates in healthy adults.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Article
- Intersession Robust Hybrid Brain-Computer Interface: Safe and User-Friendly Approach with LED Activation Mechanism.Micromachines · 2025Article
- Preliminary Analysis and Proof-of-Concept Validation of a Neuronally Controlled Visual Assistive Device Integrating Computer Vision with EEG-Based Binary Control.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Classifying Motor Imaging (MI) Electroencephalogram (EEG) signals is of vital importance for Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) systems, but challenges remain. A key challenge is to reduce the number of channels to improve flexibility, portability, and computational efficiency, especially in multi-class scenarios where more channels are needed for accurate classification. This study demonstrates that combining Electrooculogram (EOG) channels with a reduced set of EEG channels is more effective than relying on a large number of EEG channels alone. EOG channels provide useful information for MI signal classification, countering the notion that they only introduce eye-related noise. The study uses advanced deep learning techniques, including multiple 1D convolution blocks and depthwise-separable convolutions, to optimize classification accuracy. The findings in this study are tested on two datasets: dataset 1, the BCI Competition IV Dataset IIa (4-class MI), and dataset 2, the Weibo dataset (7-class MI). The performance for dataset 1, utilizing 3 EEG and 3 EOG channels (6 channels total), is of 83% accuracy, while dataset 2, with 3 EEG and 2 EOG channels (5 channels total), achieves an accuracy of 61%, demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed channel reduction method and deep learning model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.