Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39796901›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Deep Learning Unravels Differences Between Kinematic and Kinetic Gait Cycle Time Series from Two Control Samples of Healthy Children Assessed in Two Different Gait Laboratories.

Alfonso de Gorostegui, Damien Kiernan, Juan-Andrés Martín-Gonzalo, Javier López-López, Irene Pulido-Valdeolivas, Estrella Rausell, Massimiliano Zanin, David Gómez-Andrés

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alfonso de GorosteguiPhD Program in Neuroscience, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid-Cajal Institute, 28029 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4093-9875
Damien KiernanMovement Analysis Laboratory, Central Remedial Clinic, Clontarf, D03 R973 Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-5785-8831
Juan-Andrés Martín-GonzaloEscuela Universitaria de Fisioterapia de la ONCE, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28034 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4949-0843
Javier López-LópezDepartment of Rehabilitation, Hospital Universitario Infanta Sofía, Fundación para la Investigación e Innovación Biomédica del Hospital Universitario Infanta Sofía y Hospital del Henares, San Sebastián de los Reyes, 28702 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9315-1048
Irene Pulido-ValdeolivasDepartment of Anatomy, Histology & Neuroscience, School of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), 28029 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0188-2458
Estrella RausellDepartment of Anatomy, Histology & Neuroscience, School of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), 28029 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1129-7116
Massimiliano ZaninInstituto de Física Interdisciplinar y Sistemas Complejos IFISC (CSIC-UIB), Campus UIB, 07122 Palma de Mallorca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5839-0393
David Gómez-AndrésPediatric Neurology, ERN-RND, Euro-NMD, Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Passeig Vall d'Hebron 119-129, 08035 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5654-7791

Funding

Escuela Universitaria de Fisioterapia de la ONCE. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid N/AEuropean Research Center 851255European Union NextGenerationEU/PRTR MICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033FEDER N/AInstituto de Salud Carlos III FORT23/00034MCIN CEX2021-001164-MMICIU CNS2023-144775Universidad Autónoma de Madrid N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigate the application of deep learning in comparing gait cycle time series from two groups of healthy children, each assessed in different gait laboratories. Both laboratories used similar gait analysis protocols with minimal differences in data collection. Utilizing a ResNet-based deep learning model, we successfully identified the source laboratory of each dataset, achieving a high classification accuracy across multiple gait parameters. To address the inter-laboratory differences, we explored various pre-processing methods and time series properties that may have been detected by the algorithm. We found that the standardization of the time series values was a successful approach to decrease the ability of the model to distinguish between the two centers. Our findings also reveal that differences in the power spectra and autocorrelation structures of the datasets play a significant role in the model performance. Our study emphasizes the importance of standardized protocols and robust data pre-processing to enhance the transferability of machine learning models across clinical settings, particularly for deep learning approaches.

Indexed as

Deep LearningGaitGait AnalysisAlgorithmsBiomechanical PhenomenaChildFemaleHumansKineticsLaboratoriesMalechildrendeep learningexternal validitygait

Identifiers

PMID39796901
PMCPMC11723378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.