Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39796861›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Trajectory Planning for Unmanned Vehicles on Airport Apron Under Aircraft-Vehicle-Airfield Collaboration.

Dezhou Yuan, Yingxue Zhong, Xinping Zhu, Ying Chen, Yue Jin, Xinze Du, Ke Tang, Tianyu Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dezhou YuanSchool of Air Traffic Management, Civil Aviation Flight University of China, Guanghan 618307, China.ORCID 0009-0008-4614-0902
Yingxue ZhongSchool of Air Traffic Management, Civil Aviation Flight University of China, Guanghan 618307, China.
Xinping ZhuSchool of Air Traffic Management, Civil Aviation Flight University of China, Guanghan 618307, China.
Ying ChenCapital Airports Holdings Co., Ltd., Beijing 101317, China.
Yue JinCapital Airports Holdings Co., Ltd., Beijing 101317, China.
Xinze DuCapital Airports Holdings Co., Ltd., Beijing 101317, China.
Ke TangSchool of Air Traffic Management, Civil Aviation Flight University of China, Guanghan 618307, China.
Tianyu HuangSchool of Air Traffic Management, Civil Aviation Flight University of China, Guanghan 618307, China.

Funding

a grant from Key Laboratory of Green Airport, CAAC MHLVJC-20240104the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China PHD2023-042the Funds of the National Key Research and Development Program of China 2021YFB2601704
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To address the issue of safe, orderly, and efficient operation for unmanned vehicles within the apron area in the future, a hardware framework of aircraft-vehicle-airfield collaboration and a trajectory planning method for unmanned vehicles on the apron were proposed. As for the vehicle-airfield perspective, a collaboration mechanism between flight support tasks and unmanned vehicle departure movement was constructed. As for the latter, a control mechanism was established for the right-of-way control of the apron. With the goal of reducing waiting time downstream of the pre-selected path, a multi-agent reinforcement learning model with a collaborative graph was created to accomplish path selection among various origin-destination pairs. Then, we took Apron NO.2 in Ezhou Huahu Airport as an example for simulation verification. The results show that, compared with traditional methods, the proposed method improves the average vehicle speed and reduces average vehicle queue time by 11.60% and 32.34%, respectively. The right-of-way signal-switching actions are associated with the path selection behavior of the corresponding agent, fitting the created aircraft-vehicle collaboration. After 10 episodes of training, the Q-values can steadily converge, with the deviation rate decreasing from 40% to below 0.22%, making the balance between sociality and competitiveness. A single trajectory can be planned in just 0.78 s, and for each second of training, 7.54 s of future movement of vehicles can be planned in the simulation world. Future research could focus on online rolling trajectory planning for UGSVs in the apron area, and realistic verification under multi-sensor networks can further advance the application of unmanned vehicles in apron operations.

Indexed as

air transportationmulti-agent reinforcement learningvehicle trajectory planning

Identifiers

PMID39796861
PMCPMC11723120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.