SynthesisSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Understanding Cyclists' Visual Behavior Using Eye-Tracking Technology: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Eye-tracking technologies are emerging in research aiming to understand the visual behavior of cyclists to improve their safety. These technologies gather real-time information to reveal what the cyclists look at and how they respond at a specific location and time. This systematic review investigates the use of eye-tracking systems to improve cyclist safety. An extensive search of the SCOPUS and WoS databases, following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, found 610 studies published between 2010 and 2024. After filtering these studies according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, 25 were selected for final review. The included studies were conducted in real traffic or virtual environments aiming to assess visual attention, workload, or hazard perception. Studies focusing on other types of road users or participants not involved in active cycling were excluded. Results reveal the important impact of road elements' design, traffic density, and weather conditions on cyclists' gaze patterns. Significant visual workload is imposed mainly by intersections. Along with the valuable insights into cyclist safety, potential biases related to small sample sizes and technological limitations were identified. Recommendations for future research are discussed to address these challenges through more diverse samples, advanced technologies, and a greater focus on peripheral vision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.