Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39796807›Full record

SynthesisSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Impact of Pathway Shape and Length on the Validity of the 6-Minute Walking Test: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Armelle-Myriane Ngueleu, Solène Barrette, Coralie Buteau, Chloé Robichaud, Michelle Nguyen, Gauthier Everard, Charles Sebiyo Batcho

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Armelle-Myriane NgueleuCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration, Quebec City, QC G1M 2S8, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0024-7639
Solène BarretteSchool of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC G1V 0A6, Canada.
Coralie ButeauSchool of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC G1V 0A6, Canada.
Chloé RobichaudSchool of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC G1V 0A6, Canada.
Michelle NguyenCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration, Quebec City, QC G1M 2S8, Canada.
Gauthier EverardCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration, Quebec City, QC G1M 2S8, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5029-5693
Charles Sebiyo BatchoCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration, Quebec City, QC G1M 2S8, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1069-8556

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although guidelines are established for performing the six-minute walking test (6MWT), it is not always possible to implement this test in any setting, due to physical and space limitations. Yet, variations in the conditions of the test could be responsible for heterogeneous outcomes. However, the impact of the condition of the 6MWT is not clearly established in literature. The objective is to determine the influence of different implementation conditions on the validity of the 6MWT. Seventeen articles were retained after a literature review, including 597 participants. Seven articles mention that performing the test on a predetermined short back-and-forth pathway led to lower performance than when the test was performed on pathways of greater distances. The walking distance covered on a rectangular path or on a 10-m eight-form path is greater than with the back and forth on a five- to ten-meter path. Seven articles suggest that the performance achieved on a treadmill is generally lower than that obtained while walking on the ground. Evidence shows that the conditions while performing the 6MWT significantly influence the score, hence the validity of the results. The use of a ground pathway, comprising the longest linear distance possible, seems critical to ensure good validity.

Indexed as

Exercise TestWalkingWalk TestHumansfunctional assessmentpsychometricvaliditywalked distancewalking test

Identifiers

PMID39796807
PMCPMC11722874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.