ArticleCancers2025
AI-Driven Enhancement of Skin Cancer Diagnosis: A Two-Stage Voting Ensemble Approach Using Dermoscopic Data.
Article in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Deep Ensemble Learning for Multiclass Skin Lesion Classification.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSkin cancer is the most common cancer worldwide, with melanoma being the deadliest type, though it accounts for less than 5% of cases. Traditional skin cancer detection methods are effective but are often costly and time-consuming. Recent advances in artificial intelligence have improved skin cancer diagnosis by helping dermatologists identify suspicious lesions.
methodsThe study used datasets from two ethnic groups, sourced from the ISIC platform and CSMU Hospital, to develop an AI diagnostic model. Eight pre-trained models, including convolutional neural networks and vision transformers, were fine-tuned. The three best-performing models were combined into an ensemble model, which underwent multiple random experiments to ensure stability. To improve diagnostic accuracy and reduce false negatives, a two-stage classification strategy was employed: a three-class model for initial classification, followed by a binary model for secondary prediction of benign cases.
resultsIn the ISIC dataset, the false negative rate for malignant lesions was significantly reduced, and the number of malignant cases misclassified as benign dropped from 124 to 45. In the CSMUH dataset, false negatives for malignant cases were completely eliminated, reducing the number of misclassified malignant cases to zero, resulting in a notable improvement in diagnostic precision and a reduction in the false negative rate.
conclusionsThrough the proposed method, the study demonstrated clear success in both datasets. First, a three-class AI model can assist doctors in distinguishing between melanoma patients who require urgent treatment, non-melanoma skin cancer patients who can be treated later, and benign cases that do not require intervention. Subsequently, a two-stage classification strategy effectively reduces false negatives in malignant lesions. These findings highlight the potential of AI technology in skin cancer diagnosis, particularly in resource-limited medical settings, where it could become a valuable clinical tool to improve diagnostic accuracy, reduce skin cancer mortality, and reduce healthcare costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.