ReviewCancers2024
Preoperative Vascular and Cranial Nerve Imaging in Skull Base Tumors.
Review in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical utility and characteristics of comprehensive genomic profiling tests in patients with gynecologic cancer: a multi-institutional survey in Kinki District, Japan.International journal of clinical oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Skull base tumors such as meningiomas and schwannomas are often pathologically benign. However, surgery for these tumors poses significant challenges because of their proximity to critical structures such as the brainstem, cerebral arteries, veins, and cranial nerves. These structures are compressed or encased by the tumor as they grow, increasing the risk of unintended injury to these structures, which can potentially lead to severe neurological deficits. Preoperative imaging is crucial for assessing the tumor size, location, and its relationship with adjacent vital structures. This study reviews advanced imaging techniques that allow detailed visualization of vascular structures and cranial nerves. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography and digital subtraction angiography are optimal for evaluating vascular structures, whereas magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with high-resolution T2-weighted images and diffusion tensor imaging are optimal for evaluating cranial nerves. These methods help surgeons plan tumor resection strategies, including surgical approaches, more precisely. An accurate preoperative assessment can contribute to safe tumor resection and preserve neurological function. Additionally, we report the MRI contrast defect sign in skull base meningiomas, which suggests cranial nerve penetration through the tumor. This is an essential finding for inferring the course of cranial nerves completely encased within the tumor. These preoperative imaging techniques have the potential to improve the outcomes of patients with skull base tumors. Furthermore, this study highlights the importance of multimodal imaging approaches and discusses future directions for imaging technology that could further develop preoperative surgical simulations and improve the quality of complex skull base tumor surgeries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.