ReviewCancers2024
Prognostic Value of Molecular Aberrations in Low- or Intermediate-Risk Neuroblastomas: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification of potential clinical markers associated with prognosis of neuroblastoma.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Molecular Features Associated with a High-Risk Clinical Course in Neuroblastomas Initially Diagnosed as Non-High-Risk.Cancers · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe 5-year prognosis of non-high-risk neuroblastomas is generally good (>90%). However, a proportion of patients show progression and succumb to their disease. We aimed to identify molecular aberrations (not incorporated in the current risk stratification) associated with overall survival (OS) and/or event-free survival (EFS) in patients diagnosed with non-high-risk neuroblastoma.
methodsWe conducted a systematic search in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane and Google Scholar. Two reviewers independently and blindly screened titles/abstracts, references of protocols/reviews and full texts. Risk of bias was assessed using a customized Quality in Prognostic Studies tool. Applicability was assessed using a tool designed by the researchers. GRADE criteria were used to determine quality of evidence.
resultsSixteen studies (4718 patients) were included. A segmental chromosomal aberration (SCA) profile was associated with lower survival. 1p loss of heterozygosity (LOH) and 17q gain were associated with lower OS and EFS. 1p deletion and 2p gain were associated with lower OS, but this was not the same for EFS. 3p deletion was not associated with worse outcome. Quality of evidence was downgraded because of imprecision and publication bias and upgraded because of moderate/large effect, resulting in a moderate quality of evidence.
conclusionThe association of 1p LOH, 1p deletion, 2p gain and 17q gain with OS and EFS suggests that these SCAs may be added to the risk stratification to identify non-high-risk neuroblastomas with worse prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.